AIM: To determine the test characteristics and the optimal cut-off point for the (13)C urea breath test ((13)C UBT) in a Canadian community laboratory setting. METHODS: Of 2232 patients (mean age +/- SD: 51+/-21 years, 56% female) who completed a (13)C UBT, 1209 were tested to evaluate the primary diagnosis of (Helicobacter pylori) infection and 1023 were tested for confirmation of eradication following treatment. Cluster analysis was performed on the (13)C UBT data to determine the optimal cut-off point and the risk of false-positive and false-negative results. Additionally, 176 patients underwent endoscopic biopsy to allow validation of the sensitivity and specificity of the (13)C UBT against histology and microbiology using the calculated cut-off point. RESULTS: The calculated cut-off points were 3.09 delta/1000 for the whole study population (n=2232), 3.09 delta/1000 for the diagnosis group (n=1209) and 2.88 delta/1000 for the post-treatment group (n=1023). When replacing the calculated cut-off points by a practical cut-off point of 3.0 delta/1000, the risk of false-positive and false-negative results was lower than 2.3%. The (13)C UBT showed 100% sensitivity and 98.5% specificity compared with histology and microbiology (n=176) for the diagnosis of active (H pylori) infection. CONCLUSIONS: The (13)C UBT is an accurate, noninvasive test for the diagnosis of (H pylori) infection and for confirmation of cure after eradication therapy. The present study confirms the validity of a cut-off point of 3.0 delta/1000 for the (13)C UBT when used in a large Canadian community population according to a standard protocol.
AIM: To determine the test characteristics and the optimal cut-off point for the (13)C urea breath test ((13)C UBT) in a Canadian community laboratory setting. METHODS: Of 2232 patients (mean age +/- SD: 51+/-21 years, 56% female) who completed a (13)C UBT, 1209 were tested to evaluate the primary diagnosis of (Helicobacter pylori) infection and 1023 were tested for confirmation of eradication following treatment. Cluster analysis was performed on the (13)C UBT data to determine the optimal cut-off point and the risk of false-positive and false-negative results. Additionally, 176 patients underwent endoscopic biopsy to allow validation of the sensitivity and specificity of the (13)C UBT against histology and microbiology using the calculated cut-off point. RESULTS: The calculated cut-off points were 3.09 delta/1000 for the whole study population (n=2232), 3.09 delta/1000 for the diagnosis group (n=1209) and 2.88 delta/1000 for the post-treatment group (n=1023). When replacing the calculated cut-off points by a practical cut-off point of 3.0 delta/1000, the risk of false-positive and false-negative results was lower than 2.3%. The (13)C UBT showed 100% sensitivity and 98.5% specificity compared with histology and microbiology (n=176) for the diagnosis of active (H pylori) infection. CONCLUSIONS: The (13)C UBT is an accurate, noninvasive test for the diagnosis of (H pylori) infection and for confirmation of cure after eradication therapy. The present study confirms the validity of a cut-off point of 3.0 delta/1000 for the (13)C UBT when used in a large Canadian community population according to a standard protocol.
Authors: Sander J O Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Marc Bradette; Naoki Chiba; David Armstrong; Alan Barkun; Nigel Flook; Alan Thomson; Ford Bursey Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: R P Logan; R J Polson; J J Misiewicz; G Rao; N Q Karim; D Newell; P Johnson; J Wadsworth; M M Walker; J H Baron Journal: Gut Date: 1991-12 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Idit Segal; Anthony Otley; Robert Issenman; David Armstrong; Victor Espinosa; Ruth Cawdron; Muhammad G Morshed; Kevan Jacobson Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Ari Fahrial Syam; Muhammad Miftahussurur; Willy Brodus Uwan; David Simanjuntak; Tomohisa Uchida; Yoshio Yamaoka Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 3.411