Literature DB >> 17169364

In vivo glenohumeral contact forces--measurements in the first patient 7 months postoperatively.

G Bergmann1, F Graichen, A Bender, M Kääb, A Rohlmann, P Westerhoff.   

Abstract

Knowledge of forces in the glenohumeral joint is essential for understanding normal and pathologic shoulder function. It forms the basis for performing fracture treatment or joint replacement surgery, for optimizing implant design and fixation and for improving and verifying analytical biomechanical models of the shoulder. An instrumented shoulder implant with telemetric data transmission was developed to measure six components of joint contact forces and moments. A patient with humeral head arthrosis achieved good joint function after its implantation. During the first 7 postoperative months, the contact force remained below 100% BW (percent body weight) for most activities of daily living. It ranged up to 130% BW for arm positions close to the limits of motion or when acting against external resistance. When the patient tried to turn a blocked steering wheel with maximum effort, the force rose to about 150% BW, the highest level observed thus far. Of great interest were the force directions relative to the humerus, especially those in the sagittal plane, which were not greatly influenced by the type of exercise, the arm position or the external resistance. The moments due to friction in the joint reached 5.2 Nm. The friction-induced shift of contact forces relative to the implant head centre ranged up to 6.3mm. These first worldwide in vivo measurements of glenohumeral contact forces are being continued in more patients and for longer postoperative times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17169364     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  30 in total

1.  Towards the development of a novel experimental shoulder simulator with rotating scapula and individually controlled muscle forces simulating the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Daniel Baumgartner; Daniel Tomas; Lukas Gossweiler; Walter Siegl; Georg Osterhoff; Bernd Heinlein
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  [Partial weight-bearing in rehabilitation. Strategies for instruction and limitations].

Authors:  I Klöpfer-Krämer; P Augat
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Is there an association between a low acromion index and osteoarthritis of the shoulder?

Authors:  Jörn Kircher; Markus Morhard; Iosif Gavriilidis; Petra Magosch; Sven Lichtenberg; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Multi-patient finite element simulation of keeled versus pegged glenoid implant designs in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Werner Pomwenger; Karl Entacher; Herbert Resch; Peter Schuller-Götzburg
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  [Treatment after anatomical and inverse shoulder TEP].

Authors:  M Farkhondeh Fal; J Kircher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Biomechanical investigation of fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus].

Authors:  G Röderer; M AbouElsoud; F Gebhard; L Claes; A J Aschoff; L Kinzl
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Shoulder model validation and joint contact forces during wheelchair activities.

Authors:  Melissa M B Morrow; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The amount of humeral head impaction of proximal humeral fractures fixed with the Humerusblock device.

Authors:  Stefano Carbone; Philipp Moroder; Valerio Arceri; Roberto Postacchini; Stefano Gumina
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Modeling a rotator cuff tear: Individualized shoulder muscle forces influence glenohumeral joint contact force predictions.

Authors:  Meghan E Vidt; Anthony C Santago; Anthony P Marsh; Eric J Hegedus; Christopher J Tuohy; Gary G Poehling; Michael T Freehill; Michael E Miller; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant.

Authors:  Junaid Sarah; Gupta Sanjay; Sanghavi Sanjay; Anglin Carolyn; Roger Emery; Amis Andrew; Hansen Ulrich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.