Literature DB >> 24695976

The amount of humeral head impaction of proximal humeral fractures fixed with the Humerusblock device.

Stefano Carbone1, Philipp Moroder, Valerio Arceri, Roberto Postacchini, Stefano Gumina.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Humerusblock is a minimally invasive device allowing fixation of proximal humeral fractures. A drawback of the device is possible K-wire perforation of the head with the need for early removal of the implant. We assessed the amount of humeral head impaction and its role in the postoperative varus/valgus deviation of the humeral head in fractures of the upper humerus treated with Humerusblock.
METHODS: Fractures were classified according to the Codman-Lego system. The length of the posteromedial metaphyseal extension and integrity of medial hinge were measured; metaphyseal comminution was assessed. Accuracy of fracture reduction was classified as excellent to poor. An original method of measurement of amount of postoperative impaction of the humeral head was developed. The impaction and varus/valgus inclination of the heads were measured comparing postoperative and three-month follow-up radiographs. Constant score and its relation to sintering was calculated at 12-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Forty-three fractures were available for follow-up. The amount of humeral head impaction was 3.9 mm on average and was directly correlated with patient's age, sex, Codman-Lego classification, varus inclination and mataphyseal comminution. The postoperative cervico-diaphyseal angle was restored in 35 cases, with 81 % good results. The Humerusblock was removed in 41 % of cases because of K-wire perforation of the humeral head. A negative correlation was found between impaction and Constant score.
CONCLUSIONS: The amount of humeral head impaction is related to patients' age, sex, and fracture patterns, being the most prone to compaction those with metaphyseal comminution. Humeral head impaction negatively affects final Constant score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24695976      PMCID: PMC4071502          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2327-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  29 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of Neer Group VI proximal humeral fractures: retrospective comparison of PHILOS® and hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Andreas Platz; Matthias Erschbamer; Thomas Lattmann; Michael Dietrich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Functional and radiographic medium-term outcome evaluation of the Humerus Block, a minimally invasive operative technique for proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Bart J Vundelinckx; Carmen A Dierickx; Liesbeth Bruckers; Carl H Dierickx
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 3.  Proximal humeral fractures: current controversies.

Authors:  Herbert Resch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Current strategies for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures: an analysis of a survey carried out at 348 hospitals in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Authors:  Alexander Tepass; Gunnar Blumenstock; Kuno Weise; Bernd Rolauffs; Christian Bahrs
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Proximal humeral fracture classification systems revisited.

Authors:  Addie Majed; Iain Macleod; Anthony M J Bull; Karol Zyto; Herbert Resch; Ralph Hertel; Peter Reilly; Roger J H Emery
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Modification of the Resch procedure: a new technique and its results in managing three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  V I Roberts; B Komarasamy; R Pandey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-10

7.  The classification of complex 4-part humeral fractures revisited: the missing fifth fragment and indications for surgery.

Authors:  Raffaele Russo; Fabio Cautiero; Giuseppe Della Rotonda
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-04-19

8.  Percutaneous pinning of three- or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients in poor general condition: MIROS® versus traditional pinning.

Authors:  Stefano Carbone; Mario Tangari; Stefano Gumina; Roberto Postacchini; Andrea Campi; Franco Postacchini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center.

Authors:  A Roux; L Decroocq; S El Batti; N Bonnevialle; G Moineau; C Trojani; P Boileau; F de Peretti
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.256

10.  Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome.

Authors:  Bernhard Jost; Christian Spross; Holger Grehn; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  7 in total

1.  Immediate intensive mobilization compared with immediate conventional mobilization for the impacted osteoporotic conservatively treated proximal humeral fracture: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Carbone; C Razzano; P Albino; R Mezzoprete
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-08-02

2.  Titanium mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures for the treatment of humeral greater tuberosity fracture osteosynthesis versus PHILOS: a retrospective view.

Authors:  Gang Xue; Kapil Chahal; Thou Lim; Siyuan Hu; Shaohua Li; Jie Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The amount of impaction and loss of reduction in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures after surgical fixation.

Authors:  S Carbone; M Papalia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Comparison between reverse shoulder arthroplasty and Humerusblock in three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Reinhold Ortmaier; Georg Mattiassich; Matthias Pumberger; Wolfgang Hitzl; Philipp Moroder; Alexander Auffarth; Herbert Resch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparison between minimally invasive, percutaneous osteosynthesis and locking plate osteosynthesis in 3-and 4-part proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Reinhold Ortmaier; Verena Filzmaier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Robert Bogner; Thomas Neubauer; Herbert Resch; Alexander Auffarth
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Minimally Invasive Treatment of Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures in Patients Older Than 70 Years Using the Humerusblock.

Authors:  Robert Bogner; Reinhold Ortmaier; Philipp Moroder; Stefanie Karpik; Christof Wutte; Stefan Lederer; Alexander Auffarth; Herbert Resch
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Radiographic Evaluation of the Consolidation of Humerus Surgical Neck Fractures Treated With Percutaneous Fixation.

Authors:  Ivan Fadanelli Simionato; João Pedro Farina Brunelli; Marco Tonding Ferreira; Fabio Yoshihiro Matsumoto; Almiro Gerszon Britto; Fernando Carlos Mothes
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-06-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.