Literature DB >> 17167599

Comparison of Scientific Calipers and Computer-Enabled CT Review for the Measurement of Skull Base and Craniomaxillofacial Dimensions.

M J Citardi, B Herrmann, C S Hollenbeak, B C Stack, M Cooper, R D Bucholz.   

Abstract

Traditionally, cadaveric studies and plain-film cephalometrics provided information about craniomaxillofacial proportions and measurements; however, advances in computer technology now permit software-based review of computed tomography (CT)-based models. Distances between standardized anatomic points were measured on five dried human skulls with standard scientific calipers (Geneva Gauge, Albany, NY) and through computer workstation (StealthStation 2.6.4, Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technology, Louisville, CO) review of corresponding CT scans. Differences in measurements between the caliper and CT model were not statistically significant for each parameter. Measurements obtained by computer workstation CT review of the cranial skull base are an accurate representation of actual bony anatomy. Such information has important implications for surgical planning and clinical research.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 17167599      PMCID: PMC1656841          DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-12781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base        ISSN: 1531-5010


  13 in total

1.  Computer-assisted bone segment navigation.

Authors:  R Marmulla; H Niederdellmann
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  A stereotactic system for guiding complex craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  J A Fialkov; J H Phillips; J S Gruss; E E Kassel; R M Zuker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Cephalometric methods in research and private practice.

Authors:  R C THUROW
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1951-04       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  A virtual reality system for bone fragment positioning in multisegment craniofacial surgical procedures.

Authors:  C Cutting; B Grayson; J G McCarthy; C Thorne; D Khorramabadi; B Haddad; R Taylor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  A comparison of sonically derived and traditional cephalometric values.

Authors:  D L Hall; A M Bollen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification.

Authors:  S Baumrind; R C Frantz
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1971-08

7.  The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures.

Authors:  S Baumrind; R C Frantz
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1971-11

8.  An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysis.

Authors:  A Richardson
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1966-09

9.  Cephalometric analysis for upper and lower midface surgery: Part II.

Authors:  B Zide; B Grayson; J G McCarthy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  A comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography scans and stereolithographic models for evaluation of craniofacial anomalies.

Authors:  J Kragskov; S Sindet-Pedersen; C Gyldensted; K L Jensen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  5 in total

1.  "Black Bone" MRI: a potential non-ionizing method for three-dimensional cephalometric analysis--a preliminary feasibility study.

Authors:  K A Eley; S R Watt-Smith; S J Golding
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Disregarding population specificity: its influence on the sex assessment methods from the tibia.

Authors:  Anežka Kotěrová; Jana Velemínská; Ján Dupej; Hana Brzobohatá; Aleš Pilný; Jaroslav Brůžek
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Sex determination of a Tunisian population by CT scan analysis of the skull.

Authors:  Malek Zaafrane; Mehdi Ben Khelil; Ines Naccache; Ekbel Ezzedine; Frédéric Savall; Norbert Telmon; Najla Mnif; Moncef Hamdoun
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Measurement accuracy with a new dental panoramic radiographic technique based on tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Noriyuki Kitai; Yousuke Mukai; Manabu Murabayashi; Atsushi Kawabata; Kaei Washino; Masato Matsuoka; Ichirou Shimizu; Akitoshi Katsumata
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Computed tomography analysis of guinea pig bone: architecture, bone thickness and dimensions throughout development.

Authors:  Agata Witkowska; Aziza Alibhai; Chloe Hughes; Jennifer Price; Karl Klisch; Craig J Sturrock; Catrin S Rutland
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.