Literature DB >> 17166593

Go-no-go task performance improvement after anodal transcranial DC stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression.

Paulo S Boggio1, Felix Bermpohl, Adriana O Vergara, Ana L C R Muniz, Fernanda H Nahas, Priscila B Leme, Sergio P Rigonatti, Felipe Fregni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We recently showed that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can affect the performance in an affective go-no-go (AGN) task. We aimed to extend this previous investigation testing whether one session of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left DLPFC, as compared with anodal occipital and sham tDCS, affects this AGN task performance.
METHODS: Twenty-six patients with major depression were randomized to receive anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC, occipital cortex or sham tDCS (the cathode electrode was placed over the frontopolar area for the three conditions). An AGN task was performed immediately before and after treatment. Performance changes (pre and post-treatment) were compared across groups of treatment and correlated with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score changes.
RESULTS: The results show that anodal stimulation of the left DLPFC was the only condition that induced a significant improvement in task performance as shown by the increase in the number of correct responses. In addition, this effect was specific for figures with positive emotional content. This performance enhancement was not correlated with mood changes after 10 days of tDCS treatment. LIMITATIONS: Although the effects of tDCS are less focal than rTMS, it can induce a longer and stronger modulation of cortical excitability.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that left DLPFC activity is associated with positive emotional processing, confirming and extending results of previous studies that associated right DLPFC and orbito-frontal cortex activity with emotional processing. Furthermore the effects of tDCS on mood and cognition seem to be independent in major depression. These lines of evidence together shed light on the neural circuitry involved with emotional processing in major depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17166593     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  62 in total

1.  Modulation of large-scale brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation evidenced by resting-state functional MRI.

Authors:  Cleofé Peña-Gómez; Roser Sala-Lonch; Carme Junqué; Immaculada C Clemente; Dídac Vidal; Núria Bargalló; Carles Falcón; Josep Valls-Solé; Álvaro Pascual-Leone; David Bartrés-Faz
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on posterior parietal cortex disrupts visuo-spatial processing in the contralateral visual field.

Authors:  L Schweid; R J Rushmore; A Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Transcranial direct current brain stimulation decreases impulsivity in ADHD.

Authors:  Cheyenne Allenby; Mary Falcone; Leah Bernardo; E Paul Wileyto; Anthony Rostain; J Russell Ramsay; Caryn Lerman; James Loughead
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-go Task with a Diffusion Model.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Cynthia Huang-Pollock; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2016-08-15

Review 7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Gabriel Tortella; Roberta Casati; Luana V M Aparicio; Antonio Mantovani; Natasha Senço; Giordano D'Urso; Jerome Brunelin; Fabiana Guarienti; Priscila Mara Lorencini Selingardi; Débora Muszkat; Bernardo de Sampaio Pereira Junior; Leandro Valiengo; Adriano H Moffa; Marcel Simis; Lucas Borrione; André R Brunoni
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-22

8.  The role of electrode location and stimulation polarity in patient response to cortical stimulation for major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Yagna Pathak; Brian H Kopell; Aniko Szabo; Charles Rainey; Harold Harsch; Christopher R Butson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Can noninvasive brain stimulation enhance cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders?

Authors:  Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede; Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 10.  [Transcranial direct current stimulation for depressive disorders].

Authors:  S Aust; U Palm; F Padberg; M Bajbouj
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.