Literature DB >> 17163260

Analgesic efficacy and safety of lornoxicam quick-release formulation compared with diclofenac potassium: randomised, double-blind trial in acute low back pain.

N Yakhno1, A Guekht, A Skoromets, N Spirin, E Strachunskaya, A Ternavsky, K J Olsen, P L Moller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: NSAIDs are widely used for patients presenting with low back pain. A quick-release formulation of lornoxicam, a potent NSAID from the chemical class of oxicams, offers a faster onset of pain relief compared with the standard tablet formulation.
METHODS: Time to onset of pain relief with lornoxicam was compared with the quick-release formulation of diclofenac potassium in acute low back pain in a randomised, double-blind, multicentre study. 220 patients received either lornoxicam 24 mg or diclofenac potassium 150 mg on day 1 followed by lornoxicam 8 mg twice daily or diclofenac potassium 50 mg twice daily for 5 days. Efficacy outcomes included time to onset of pain relief, as measured by the stopwatch method (primary outcome), pain intensity, pain relief, rescue medication, ability to perform daily activities and global evaluation of the study medication.
RESULTS: The time to onset of pain relief ratios between diclofenac potassium/lornoxicam was 1.03 (95% CI 0.91, 1.26) and 1.05 (95% CI 0.93, 1.29) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively, demonstrating the non-inferiority of lornoxicam (defined by lower limits of the 95% CIs >0.80). Time to onset of pain relief was shorter with lornoxicam (30 minutes) compared with diclofenac potassium (36 minutes). The difference was not statistically significant (ITT analysis). A higher magnitude of analgesic effect associated with better global evaluation of the study medication for lornoxicam was also demonstrated. The drugs were equally well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: Lornoxicam administered as a quick-release formulation was shown to be non-inferior to the equivalent formulation of diclofenac potassium in terms of onset of pain relief and more effective on most of the major standard efficacy outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17163260     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200626050-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  9 in total

1.  Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group.

Authors:  P Jellema; M W van Tulder; M N van Poppel; A L Nachemson; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group.

Authors:  M W van Tulder; R J Scholten; B W Koes; R A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Low back pain.

Authors:  Cathy Speed
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-08

Review 4.  A comprehensive review of clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of drugs for the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  Thomas J Schnitzer; Aimee Ferraro; Elke Hunsche; Sheldon X Kong
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Prevalence of low back pain in the community: implications for service provision in Bradford, UK.

Authors:  M Hillman; A Wright; G Rajaratnam; A Tennant; M A Chamberlain
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 6.  Lornoxicam. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of painful and inflammatory conditions.

Authors:  J A Balfour; A Fitton; L B Barradell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Pharmacokinetics of lornoxicam in man.

Authors:  G Hitzenberger; S Radhofer-Welte; F Takacs; D Rosenow
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Lornoxicam, a new potent NSAID with an improved tolerability profile.

Authors:  S Radhofer-Welte; X Rabasseda
Journal:  Drugs Today (Barc)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.245

9.  The effectiveness of four interventions for the prevention of low back pain.

Authors:  A Lahad; A D Malter; A O Berg; R A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-10-26       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders, whiplash-associated disorders, or non-specific low back pain? A systematic review of systematic reviews by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration.

Authors:  Jessica J Wong; Pierre Côté; Arthur Ameis; Sharanya Varatharajan; Thepikaa Varatharajan; Heather M Shearer; Robert J Brison; Deborah Sutton; Kristi Randhawa; Hainan Yu; Danielle Southerst; Rachel Goldgrub; Silvano Mior; Maja Stupar; Linda J Carroll; Anne Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Safety of lornoxicam in the treatment of postoperative pain: a post-marketing study of analgesic regimens containing lornoxicam compared with standard analgesic treatment in 3752 day-case surgery patients.

Authors:  Narinder Rawal; Karsten Krøner; Marija Simin-Geertsen; Charlotte Hejl; Rudolf Likar
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Analgesic efficacy of quick-release versus standard lornoxicam for pain after third molar surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose trial.

Authors:  Philip L Møller; Sven E Nørholt
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Low back pain (acute).

Authors:  Hamilton Hall; Greg McIntosh
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-10-03

5.  A comparative study of efficacy and safety of lornoxicam versus tramadol as analgesics after surgery on head and neck.

Authors:  Sudip Kr Das; Manasi Banerjee; Shirsendu Mondal; Balaram Ghosh; Bhaskar Ghosh; Shubhrakanti Sen
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-01-22

6.  Comparative bioavailability of lornoxicam as single doses of quick-release tablet, standard tablet and intramuscular injection: a randomized, open-label, crossover phase I study in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Susanna Radhofer-Welte; Peter Dittrich; Marija Simin; Poul Erik Branebjerg
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  A literature review reveals that trials evaluating treatment of non-specific low back pain use inconsistent criteria to identify serious pathologies and nerve root involvement.

Authors:  Ciaran Williams; Mark J Hancock; Manuela Ferreira; Paulo Ferreira; Chris G Maher
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

8.  A multicentre, randomised, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of intramuscular dexketoprofen versus diclofenac in the symptomatic treatment of acute low back pain.

Authors:  H Zippel; A Wagenitz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 9.  The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Tom Bjørkli; Philip Bright; Dévan Rajendran; Rachelle Buchbinder; Martin Underwood; David Evans; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute low back pain.

Authors:  Wendelien H van der Gaag; Pepijn Ddm Roelofs; Wendy Tm Enthoven; Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.