Literature DB >> 17162122

Concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer.

Nam P Nguyen1, Paul Vos, Herbert J Smith, Phuc D Nguyen, Alan Alfieri, Ulf Karlsson, Suresh Dutta, Claire Lemanski, Ly M Nguyen, Sabah Sallah.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the survival, pattern of failure, morbidity, and prognostic factors of concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective survey of patients who underwent chemotherapy and radiation for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma at the Veteran Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Tex.
RESULTS: Between December 1999 and September 2004, 48 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer underwent concurrent chemotherapy and radiation. At a median follow-up of 23 months, the 3- and 5-year survival for the whole group were, respectively, 52% and 41%. Seventeen patients (35%) developed recurrences. There were 12 (25%) locoregional failures (6 local failures alone and 6 local and regional failures). Distant metastases developed in 8 patients (5 alone, 3 associated with locoregional failures). Four patients (8%) developed second primaries. No difference was observed in survival between base of tongue and tonsillar carcinoma (P = .32). The 5-year survival for T1-T2 and T3-T4 tumors was, respectively, 84% and 27% (P = .01). No patient with T1-T2 tumors developed distant metastases (P = .04). Forty-five patients (94%) developed toxicity grade 3 to 4 (40 mucositis and 26 hematological). The median weight loss was 18 lb (range, 0-47 lb). Eight patients (16%) developed aspiration pneumonia during and after treatment. Five patients (10%) died of aspiration (2 during and 3 post treatment). Four patients (8%) developed esophageal strictures requiring repeated dilatations post treatment. Two patients had radionecrosis (1 soft tissue and 1 bone) requiring hyperbaric oxygen. Eighteen patients (37%) had prolonged tube feedings (>3 months) after treatments because of severe dysphagia or aspiration.
CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiation provided good locoregional control for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Patients with small tumors (T1-T2) had excellent survival. The poor prognosis associated with large tumors may be due to the risk of developing distant metastases. Acute and late toxicities remained significant. Aspiration pneumonia and severe dysphagia were the most prevalent complications of the combined modality approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17162122     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0196-0709            Impact factor:   1.808


  16 in total

1.  Oncologic and functional results after transoral laser microsurgery of tongue base carcinoma.

Authors:  Martin Canis; Friedrich Ihler; Hendrik A Wolff; Hans Christiansen; Christoph Matthias; Wolfgang Steiner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Controversies in the management of tongue base cancer.

Authors:  J P O'Neill; J P Hughes; K P Manning; J E Fenton
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy.

Authors:  Paul B Romesser; Jonathan C Romanyshyn; Karen D Schupak; Jeremy Setton; Nadeem Riaz; Suzanne L Wolden; Daphna Y Gelblum; Eric J Sherman; Dennis Kraus; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Relation of mucous membrane alterations to oral intake during the first year after treatment for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Roa Pauloski; Alfred W Rademaker; Jerilyn A Logemann; Donna Lundy; Michelle Bernstein; Carrie McBreen; Daphne Santa; Angela Campanelli; Lisa Kelchner; Bernice Klaben; Muveddet Discekici-Harris
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Effect of induction chemotherapy on swallow physiology and saliva production in patients with head and neck cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Bharat B Mittal; Barbara Roa Pauloski; Alfred W Rademaker; Muveddet Discekici-Harris; Irene B Helenowski; Ann Mellot; Mark Agulnik; Jerilyn A Logemann
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Swallowing Skills and Aspiration Risk Following Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers.

Authors:  Mansi Jagtap; Mansi Karnad
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-16

7.  The role of sequential chemoradiation for local advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Liam Masterson; Faiz Tanweer
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Functional outcomes and rehabilitation strategies in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisette van der Molen; Maya A van Rossum; Lori M Burkhead; Ludi E Smeele; Frans J M Hilgers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the management of locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomata (SCC): disease control and functional outcome using the therapy outcome measure (TOM) score--report from a single U.K. institution.

Authors:  Charlotte J Ingle; Kent Yip; Valerie Caskie; Catherine Dyson; Amanda Ford; Christopher D Scrase
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2010-10-14

10.  Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) +/- adjuvant therapy for advanced stage oropharyngeal cancer: outcomes and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Jason T Rich; Simon Milov; James S Lewis; Wade L Thorstad; Douglas R Adkins; Bruce H Haughey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.