Literature DB >> 17161241

Myocardial contrast echocardiography evolving as a clinically feasible technique for accurate, rapid, and safe assessment of myocardial perfusion: the evidence so far.

Pieter A Dijkmans1, Roxy Senior, Harald Becher, Thomas R Porter, Kevin Wei, Cees A Visser, Otto Kamp.   

Abstract

Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is a recently developed technique for assessment of myocardial perfusion. Up to now, many studies have demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of qualitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by MCE in patients with acute and chronic ischemic heart disease are comparable with other techniques such as cardiac scintigraphy and dobutamine stress echocardiography. Furthermore, quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion derived from MCE correlate well with the current clinical standard for this purpose, positron emission tomography. Myocardial contrast echocardiography provides a promising and valuable tool for assessment of myocardial perfusion. Although MCE has been primarily performed for medical research, its implementation in routine clinical care is evolving. This article is intended to give an overview of the current status of MCE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17161241     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  32 in total

1.  Value of additional myocardial perfusion imaging during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance for the assessment of intermediate coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Rolf Gebker; M Frick; C Jahnke; A Berger; C Schneeweis; R Manka; S Kelle; C Klein; B Schnackenburg; E Fleck; I Paetsch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischaemia and viability assessment.

Authors:  M Pakkal; V Raj; G P McCann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Contrast echocardiography: an update.

Authors:  Rajesh K Chelliah; Roxy Senior
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Clinical application and laboratory protocols for performing contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Adrian Chong; Brian Haluska; Sudhir Wahi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-04-06

Review 6.  Cardiovascular therapeutic uses of targeted ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Susan T Laing; David D McPherson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  Resting qualitative and quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography to predict cardiac events in patients with acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous revascularization.

Authors:  Sahar S Abdelmoneim; Matthew W Martinez; Sunil V Mankad; Mathieu Bernier; Abhijeet Dhoble; Patricia A Pellikka; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Jae K Oh; Sharon L Mulvagh
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Perfusion using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: Technical Note.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Muhammad A Saleem; Emrah Aytac; Shawn S Wallery
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2017-01

9.  Quantitative segmental analysis of myocardial perfusion to differentiate stress cardiomyopathy from acute myocardial infarction: A myocardial contrast echocardiography study.

Authors:  Sun-Yang Min; Jong-Min Song; Yewon Shin; Min-Jung Sin; Dae-Hee Kim; Duk-Hyun Kang; Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Limitations and potential clinical application on contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Elisa Modonesi; Manrico Balbi; Gian Paolo Bezante
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2010-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.