Literature DB >> 17157916

Characterizing phase-only fMRI data with an angular regression model.

Daniel B Rowe1, Christopher P Meller, Raymond G Hoffmann.   

Abstract

FMRI voxel time series are complex-valued with real and imaginary parts that are usually converted to magnitude-phase polar coordinates. Magnitude-only data models that discard the phase portion of the data have dominated fMRI analysis. However, when such analyses are performed, the data that is discarded may contain valuable biologic information that is not in the magnitude data. This biologic information from BOLD fMRI data may be vascular [Menon RS. Postacquisition suppression of large-vessel BOLD signals in high-resolution fMRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47(1):1-9] or neuronal [Bodurka J, Jesmanowicz A, Hyde JS, Xu H, Estowski L, Li S-J. Current-induced magnetic resonance phase imaging. J Magn Reson 1999;137(1):265-71] in origin. When phase-only time series that discard the magnitude portion of the data have been analyzed, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression has been the technique of choice. However, OLS models may fit poorly when phase-wrap or low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is present. We have explored alternatives to the OLS model which will account for the angular response of the phase while also allowing us the flexibility to develop similar hypothesis tests. We adopt an angular regression model by Fisher and Lee [Fisher NI, Lee AJ. Regression models for an angular response. Biometrics 1992;48:665-77] for our analysis and show its improvement over the OLS model at low SNR in terms of both parameter estimation and inferences. We found an improvement in parameter estimation along with modeling for the Fisher and Lee method in simulated data while detailing potential benefits when used with experimentally acquired data. Finally, we look at a map of the statistics testing the association of the observed voxel phase time course and the reference function in our acquired data. This shows the possible detection of biological information in the generally discarded phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17157916      PMCID: PMC3222464          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  13 in total

1.  Generalized likelihood ratio detection for fMRI using complex data.

Authors:  F Y Nan; R D Nowak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Investigation of low frequency drift in fMRI signal.

Authors:  A M Smith; B K Lewis; U E Ruttimann; F Q Ye; T M Sinnwell; Y Yang; J H Duyn; J A Frank
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  An evaluation of thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Brent R Logan; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Current-induced magnetic resonance phase imaging.

Authors:  J Bodurka; A Jesmanowicz; J S Hyde; H Xu; L Estkowski; S J Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Complex fMRI analysis with unrestricted phase is equivalent to a magnitude-only model.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Brent R Logan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Parameter estimation in the magnitude-only and complex-valued fMRI data models.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Multivariate statistical analysis in fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Raymond G Hoffmann
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr

8.  A regression technique for angular variates.

Authors:  A L Gould
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data.

Authors:  H Gudbjartsson; S Patz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; E C Wong; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  10 in total

1.  Physiologic noise regression, motion regression, and TOAST dynamic field correction in complex-valued fMRI time series.

Authors:  Andrew D Hahn; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Enhancing the utility of complex-valued functional magnetic resonance imaging detection of neurobiological processes through postacquisition estimation and correction of dynamic B(0) errors and motion.

Authors:  Andrew D Hahn; Andrew S Nencka; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Enhanced phase regression with Savitzky-Golay filtering for high-resolution BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  Robert L Barry; John C Gore
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Complex and magnitude-only preprocessing of 2D and 3D BOLD fMRI data at 7 T.

Authors:  Robert L Barry; Stephen C Strother; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Improving robustness and reliability of phase-sensitive fMRI analysis using temporal off-resonance alignment of single-echo timeseries (TOAST).

Authors:  Andrew D Hahn; Andrew S Nencka; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging brain activation directly from k-space.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Andrew D Hahn; Andrew S Nencka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Complex-valued analysis of arterial spin labeling-based functional magnetic resonance imaging signals.

Authors:  Luis Hernandez-Garcia; Alberto L Vazquez; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  COMPLEX-VALUED TIME SERIES MODELING FOR IMPROVED ACTIVATION DETECTION IN FMRI STUDIES.

Authors:  Daniel W Adrian; Ranjan Maitra; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  Magnitude and phase behavior of multiresolution BOLD signal.

Authors:  Zikuan Chen; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 1.176

10.  Biophysical modeling of phase changes in BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  Zhaomei Feng; Arvind Caprihan; Krastan B Blagoev; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.