Literature DB >> 15850730

Parameter estimation in the magnitude-only and complex-valued fMRI data models.

Daniel B Rowe1.   

Abstract

In functional magnetic resonance imaging, voxel time courses are complex-valued data but are traditionally converted to real magnitude-only data ones. At a large signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the magnitude-only data Ricean distribution is approximated by a normal distribution that has been suggested as reasonable in magnitude-only data magnetic resonance images for an SNR of 5 and potentially as low as 3. A complex activation model has been recently introduced by Rowe and Logan [Rowe, D.B., and Logan, B.R. (2004). A complex way to compute fMRI activation. NeuroImage, 23 (3):1078-1092] that is valid for all SNRs. The properties of the parameter estimators and activation statistic for these two models and a more accurate Ricean approximation based on a Taylor series expansion are characterized in terms of bias, variance, and Cramer-Rao lower bound. It was found that the unbiased estimators in the complex model continued to be unbiased for lower SNRs while those of the normal magnitude-only data model became biased as the SNR decreased and at differing levels for the regression coefficients. The unbiased parameter estimators from the approximate magnitude-only Ricean Taylor model were unbiased to lower SNRs than the magnitude-only normal ones. Further, the variances of the parameter estimators achieved their minimum value in the complex data model regardless of SNR while the magnitude-only data normal model and Ricean approximation using a Taylor series did not as the SNR decreased. Finally, the mean activation statistic for the complex data model was higher and not SNR dependent while it decreased with SNR in the magnitude-only data models but less so for the approximate Ricean model. These results indicate that using the complex data model and not approximations to the true magnitude-only Ricean data model is more appropriate at lower SNRs. Therefore, since the computational cost is relatively low for the complex data model and since the SNR is not inherently known a priori for all voxels, the complex data model is recommended at all SNRs.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15850730     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  17 in total

1.  Macrovascular contribution in activation patterns of working memory.

Authors:  Dardo G Tomasi; Elisabeth C Caparelli
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Characterizing phase-only fMRI data with an angular regression model.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Christopher P Meller; Raymond G Hoffmann
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Signal and noise of Fourier reconstructed fMRI data.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Andrew S Nencka; Raymond G Hoffmann
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  COmplex-Model-Based Estimation of thermal noise for fMRI data in the presence of artifacts.

Authors:  Yin Xu; Gaohong Wu; Daniel B Rowe; Yuan Ma; Rongyan Zhang; Guofan Xu; Shi-Jiang Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Evaluation of statistical inference on empirical resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Xue Yang; Hakmook Kang; Allen T Newton; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Enhancing the utility of complex-valued functional magnetic resonance imaging detection of neurobiological processes through postacquisition estimation and correction of dynamic B(0) errors and motion.

Authors:  Andrew D Hahn; Andrew S Nencka; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  TWO-STAGE EMPIRICAL LIKELIHOOD FOR LONGITUDINAL NEUROIMAGING DATA.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Shi; Joseph G Ibrahim; Jeffrey Lieberman; Martin Styner; Hongtu Zhu
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  Ricean over Gaussian modelling in magnitude fMRI Analysis-Added Complexity with Negligible Practical Benefits.

Authors:  Daniel W Adrian; Ranjan Maitra; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2013-12-08

9.  Unified framework for robust estimation of brain networks from FMRI using temporal and spatial correlation analyses.

Authors:  Yongmei Michelle Wang; Jing Xia
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging brain activation directly from k-space.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Andrew D Hahn; Andrew S Nencka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.