Literature DB >> 10329292

Investigation of low frequency drift in fMRI signal.

A M Smith1, B K Lewis, U E Ruttimann, F Q Ye, T M Sinnwell, Y Yang, J H Duyn, J A Frank.   

Abstract

Low frequency drift (0.0-0.015 Hz) has often been reported in time series fMRI data. This drift has often been attributed to physiological noise or subject motion, but no studies have been done to test this assumption. Time series T*2-weighted volumes were acquired on two clinical 1.5 T MRI systems using spiral and EPI readout gradients from cadavers, a normal volunteer, and nonhomogeneous and homogeneous phantoms. The data were tested for significant differences (P = 0.001) from Gaussian noise in the frequency range 0.0-0.015 Hz. The percentage of voxels that were significant in data from the cadaver, normal volunteer, nonhomogeneous and homogeneous phantoms were 13.7-49.0%, 22.1-61.9%, 46.4-68.0%, and 1.10%, respectively. Low frequency drift was more pronounced in regions with high spatial intensity gradients. Significant drifting was present in data acquired from cadavers and nonhomogeneous phantoms and all pulse sequences tested, implying that scanner instabilities and not motion or physiological noise may be the major cause of the drift. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10329292     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  112 in total

1.  A 4D approach to the analysis of functional brain images: application to FMRI data.

Authors:  A Ledberg; P Fransson; J Larsson; K M Petersson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples.

Authors:  Thomas E Nichols; Andrew P Holmes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Neuronal correlates of perception in early visual cortex.

Authors:  David Ress; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking.

Authors:  Barbara Zenger-Landolt; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Causal interactions in attention networks predict behavioral performance.

Authors:  Xiaotong Wen; Li Yao; Yijun Liu; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Is sedation-induced BOLD fMRI low-frequency fluctuation increase mediated by increased motion?

Authors:  Jaroslav Hlinka; Charilaos Alexakis; Jonathan G Hardman; Quazi Siddiqui; Dorothee P Auer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Ultra-fast magnetic resonance encephalography of physiological brain activity - Glymphatic pulsation mechanisms?

Authors:  Vesa Kiviniemi; Xindi Wang; Vesa Korhonen; Tuija Keinänen; Timo Tuovinen; Joonas Autio; Pierre LeVan; Shella Keilholz; Yu-Feng Zang; Jürgen Hennig; Maiken Nedergaard
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Neural activities in V1 create the bottom-up saliency map of natural scenes.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Xilin Zhang; Yizhou Wang; Tiangang Zhou; Fang Fang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Automated classification of fMRI data employing trial-based imagery tasks.

Authors:  Jong-Hwan Lee; Matthew Marzelli; Ferenc A Jolesz; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Improving the use of principal component analysis to reduce physiological noise and motion artifacts to increase the sensitivity of task-based fMRI.

Authors:  David A Soltysik; David Thomasson; Sunder Rajan; Nadia Biassou
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.