| Literature DB >> 17156440 |
Haruki Komatsu1, Ayano Inui, Tsuyoshi Sogo, Tomoo Fujisawa, Hironori Nagasaka, Shigeaki Nonoyama, Sophie Sierro, John Northfield, Michaela Lucas, Anita Vargas, Paul Klenerman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cellular immunity plays a crucial role in cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and substantial populations of CMV-specific T cells accumulate throughout life. However, although CMV infection occurs during childhood, relatively little is know about the typical quantity and quality of T cell responses in pediatric populations.Entities:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17156440 PMCID: PMC1784110 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4933-3-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Immun Ageing ISSN: 1742-4933 Impact factor: 6.400
Figure 1Example of CMV tetramer staining in infants. A symptomatic 2-month-old HLA-A2+ infant (A) and an asymptomatic 1-month-old HLA-A24+ infant (B) were stained with pp65 tetramer. The plot shown is gated on live lymphocytes and reveals a frequency of HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells. HLA-A2 tetramer/CD 8+ lymphocytes was 1.51% in the HLA-A2 infant and 0.87% in the HLA-A24+ infant.
Summary of HCMV-tetramer in HLA-A2 individual groups
| Age(yr.) (n = 469) | 0–4 (n = 179) | 5–9 (n = 97) | 10–14 (n = 94) | 15–19 (n = 50) | 20–29 (n = 28) | 60–92 (n = 21) |
| Number of tet(+) | 55(31%) | 43(44%) | 49(52%) | 28(46%) | 15(54%) | 12(57%) |
| CD8(%) | 18.9 ± 4.7 | 21.5 ± 7.4 | 20.2 ± 6.9 | 20.3 ± 6.7 | 24.8 ± 7.1 | 23.2 ± 9.6 |
| Tet(%) | 0.19 ± 0.23 | 0.18 ± 0.25 | 0.22 ± 0.31 | 0.23 ± 0.19 | 0.41 ± 0.54 | 1.49 ± 1.79 |
| Tet/CD8(%) | 1.05 ± 1.30 | 0.85 ± 1.04 | 1.02 ± 1.36 | 1.14 ± 0.96 | 1.55 ± 1.71 | 5.76 ± 4.19 |
HCMV-tetramer positive: Tet/CD8(+) Lymphocytes ≥ 0.05%
Summary of HCMV-tetramer in HLA-A24 individual groups
| Age(yr.) (n = 519) | 0–4 (n = 202) | 5–9 (n = 106) | 10–14 (n = 108) | 15–19 (n = 58) | 20–29 (n = 45) |
| Number of tet(+) | 39(19%) | 32(30%) | 23(21%) | 24(41%) | 15(33%) |
| CD8(%) | 20.0 ± 5.7 | 18.6 ± 5.1 | 19.5 ± 6.9 | 22.3 ± 8.3 | 24.8 ± 6.4 |
| Tet(%) | 0.05 ± 0.07 | 0.02 ± 0.03 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.06 | 0.03 ± 0.03 |
| Tet/CD8(%) | 0.21 ± 0.31 | 0.12 ± 0.10 | 0.15 ± 0.24 | 0.14 ± 0.16 | 0.12 ± 0.10 |
HCMV-tetramer positive: Tet/CD8(+) Lymphocytes ≥ 0.04%
Summary of HCMV-tetramer in HLA-A2 young children
| Age(yr.) (n = 179) | < 1 (n = 60) | 1 (n = 45) | 2 (n = 30) | 3 (n = 27) | 4 (n = 17) |
| Number of tet(+) | 14(23%) | 17(38%) | 9(30%) | 11(41%) | 4(24%) |
| CD8 | 18.1 ± 5.1 | 16.7 ± 4.1 | 22.5 ± 3.5 | 19.7 ± 4.4 | 20.1 ± 5.1 |
| Tet(%) | 0.20 ± 0.20 | 0.25 ± 0.32 | 0.17 ± 0.19 | 0.15 ± 0.14 | 0.08 ± 0.05 |
| Tet/CD8(%) | 1.16 ± 1.13 | 1.48 ± 1.78* | 0.73 ± 0.77* | 0.75 ± 0.65* | 0.28 ± 0.26* |
HCMV-tetramer positive: Tet/CD8(+) Lymphocytes ≥ 0.05%
*: P values < 0.05
Summary of HCMV-tetramer in HLA-A24 young children
| Age(yr.) (n = 202) | < 1 (n = 66) | 1 (n = 46) | 2 (n = 38) | 3 (n = 25) | 4 (n = 27) |
| Number of tet(+) | 11(17%) | 11(24%) | 7(18%) | 4(16%) | 6(22%) |
| CD8 | 17.0 ± 5.0 | 20.0 ± 6.9 | 19.2 ± 4.2 | 22.3 ± 3.8 | 24.8 ± 5.6 |
| Tet(%) | 0.07 ± 0.08 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.10 | 0.01 ± 0 | 0.03 ± 0.03 |
| Tet/CD8(%) | 0.34 ± 0.32* | 0.16 ± 0.15* | 0.28 ± 0.55* | 0.05 ± 0.01* | 0.11 ± 0.12 |
HCMV-tetramer positive: Tet/CD8(+) Lymphocytes ≥ 0.04%
*: P values < 0.05
Figure 2Correlation of HLA-A2 HCMV tetramer staining and IFN-γ Elispot assay. (A) 56 HLA-A2+ subjects were studied, including children and adults (age: from 3 months to 29 years old, mean ± SD; 10.5 ± 7.3 years). (B) 17 HLA-A24 subjects were studied including children and adults (age: from 1 month to 23 years old, mean ± SD; 8.9 ± 8.8 years).
Figure 3Correlation between intracellular interferon-γ staining and HLA-A2 HCMV tetramer positive cells/CD8+ lymphocytes. There were 33 subjects including children, and adults (age: from 2 months to 29 years old, mean ± SD; 10.1 ± 8.5 years).
Figure 4IFN-γ ELISPOT assay of HLA-A2 individuals by age-group. Individuals from different age groups as indicated were analyzed for HLA-A2 peptide specific responses using ELISPOT as previously. The differences shown were not significant.
Phenotype (CD27, CD28) of tetramer-positive CD8+ cells in individual groups
| Age(yr.) (n = 133) | 0–4 (n = 31) | 5–9 (n = 24) | 10–14 (n = 24) | 15–19 (n = 29) | 20–29 (n = 13) | 60–92 (n = 12) |
| % | ||||||
| CD28(-)CD27(+) | 43.2 ± 16.8 | 42.5 ± 14.9 | 39.1 ± 14.4 | 31.3 ± 13.7 | 31.6 ± 11.9 | 17.2 ± 14.1 |
| CD28(+)CD27(+) | 34.9 ± 23.2 | 28.9 ± 14.5 | 26.7 ± 13.4 | 32.8 ± 16.0 | 40.6 ± 14.9 | 28.1 ± 17.2 |
| CD28(-)CD27(-) | 20.8 ± 17.0 | 26.0 ± 18.9 | 30.0 ± 16.9 | 31.4 ± 20.0 | 22.3 ± 12.0 | 40.0 ± 20.5 |
| CD28(+)CD27(-) | 1.1 ± 2.5 | 2.6 ± 3.2 | 4.2 ± 8.7 | 4.5 ± 4.7 | 5.5 ± 6.6 | 22.0 ± 24.2 |
Phenotype (CD45RA, CD45RO) of tetramer-positive CD8+ cells in individual groups
| Age(yr.) (n = 131) | 0–4 (n = 31) | 5–9 (n = 24) | 10–14 (n = 24) | 15–19 (n = 29) | 20–29 (n = 13) | 60–92 (n = 12) |
| % | ||||||
| CD45RA(-)45RO(+) | 12.7 ± 14.5 | 27.1 ± 22.9 | 23.3 ± 21.8 | 27.5 ± 23.5 | 21.2 ± 19.5 | 18.0 ± 26.0 |
| CD45RA(+)45RO(+) | 30.1 ± 21.8 | 24.7 ± 16.6 | 20.0 ± 11.7 | 21.4 ± 15.9 | 26.6 ± 18.2 | 21.2 ± 16.8 |
| CD45RA(-)45RO(-) | 12.7 ± 11.0 | 15.5 ± 12.0 | 12.1 ± 9.7 | 15.9 ± 12.7 | 18.4 ± 15.2 | 12.2 ± 15.5 |
| CD45RA(+)45RO(-) | 43.1 ± 20.5 | 32.7 ± 14.6 | 44.5 ± 20.4 | 35.2 ± 20.6 | 33.7 ± 18.9 | 48.5 ± 30.9 |