Literature DB >> 11520783

Tetramer-based quantification of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes in T-cell-depleted stem cell grafts and after transplantation may identify patients at risk for progressive CMV infection.

J W Gratama1, J W van Esser, C H Lamers, C Tournay, B Löwenberg, R L Bolhuis, J J Cornelissen.   

Abstract

Recovery of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T-cell-mediated immunity after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is critical for protection against CMV disease. The study used fluorochrome-conjugated tetrameric complexes of HLA-A2 molecules loaded with the immunodominant NLVPMVATV (NLV) peptide derived from the CMV protein pp65 to quantify A2-NLV-specific CD8+ T cells in partially T-cell-depleted grafts administered to 27 HLA-A*0201+ patients and to monitor recovery of these T cells during the first 12 months after SCT. None of the 9 CMV-seronegative patients became infected with CMV, whereas 14 of 18 CMV-seropositive patients developed CMV antigenemia after SCT. CMV-seropositive recipients of grafts from CMV-seronegative donors required more preemptive treatment with ganciclovir (GCV) than those of grafts from CMV-seropositive donors (3 [1-6] versus 1 [0-3] courses, respectively; P =.009). The number of A2-NLV-specific CD8+ T cells in the grafts correlated inversely with the number of preemptive GCV courses administered (r = -0.61; P =.01). None of the 9 CMV-seronegative patients mounted a CMV-specific immune response as measured by monitoring A2-NLV-specific CD8+ T cells after SCT. Thirteen of 14 CMV-seropositive patients without CMV disease recovered these T cells. In spite of preemptive GCV treatment, CMV disease developed in 4 patients, who all failed to recover A2-NLV-specific CD8+ T cells after SCT (P =.002). Thus, enumeration of HLA-restricted, CMV-specific CD8+ T cells in the grafts and monitoring of these T cells after SCT may constitute a rapid and sensitive tool to identify SCT recipients at risk for developing CMV disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11520783     DOI: 10.1182/blood.v98.5.1358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  57 in total

Review 1.  Separating antiviral and GVHD activities of donor T cells prior to bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  Catherine T Jordan; John D Roback
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.829

2.  Three sensitive assays do not provide evidence for circulating HuD-specific T cells in the blood of patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes with anti-Hu antibodies.

Authors:  Adriaan H C de Jongste; Marieke T de Graaf; Emanuela Martinuzzi; Patricia D M van den Broek; Jaco Kraan; Cor H J Lamers; Roberto Mallone; Jan W Gratama; Peter A E Sillevis Smitt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Structural engineering of pMHC reagents for T cell vaccines and diagnostics.

Authors:  Vesselin Mitaksov; Steven M Truscott; Lonnie Lybarger; Janet M Connolly; Ted H Hansen; Daved H Fremont
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2007-08

4.  No evidence for the presence of HuD-specific T cells in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Hu-associated paraneoplastic neurological syndromes.

Authors:  Janet W de Beukelaar; Johannes C Milikan; Georges M Verjans; Marieke T de Graaf; Yvette van Norden; Cor H Lamers; Martin J van den Bent; Jacoline E Bromberg; Esther Hulsenboom; Kees Sintnicolaas; Jan W Gratama; Peter A Sillevis Smitt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  The immune response to cytomegalovirus in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Miriam Ciáurriz; Amaya Zabalza; Lorea Beloki; Cristina Mansilla; Estela Pérez-Valderrama; Mercedes Lachén; Eva Bandrés; Eduardo Olavarría; Natalia Ramírez
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Rapid Acquisition of Cytomegalovirus-Specific T Cells with a Differentiated Phenotype, in Nonviremic Hematopoietic Stem Transplant Recipients Vaccinated with CMVPepVax.

Authors:  Corinna La Rosa; Jeffrey Longmate; Chetan Raj Lingaraju; Qiao Zhou; Teodora Kaltcheva; Nicola Hardwick; Ibrahim Aldoss; Ryotaro Nakamura; Don J Diamond
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Maternal cytomegalovirus-specific immune responses and symptomatic postnatal cytomegalovirus transmission in very low-birth-weight preterm infants.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Ehlinger; Emily M Webster; Helen H Kang; Aislyn Cangialose; Adam C Simmons; Kimberly H Barbas; Sandra K Burchett; Mary L Gregory; Karen M Puopolo; Karen P Puopolo; Sallie R Permar
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Favorable impact of natural killer cell reconstitution on chronic graft-versus-host disease and cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Vissal David Kheav; Marc Busson; Catherine Scieux; Régis Peffault de Latour; Guitta Maki; Philippe Haas; Marie-Christine Mazeron; Maryvonnick Carmagnat; Emeline Masson; Aliénor Xhaard; Marie Robin; Patricia Ribaud; Nicolas Dulphy; Pascale Loiseau; Dominique Charron; Gérard Socié; Antoine Toubert; Hélène Moins-Teisserenc
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Successful allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in a patient with acute myelogenous leukemia and cytomegalovirus retinitis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Matsubara; Souichi Adachi; Jun Yano; Noriko Kitamura; Maki Miyazaki; Yasuhiro Mizushima; Hidefumi Hiramatsu; Michihiro Kobayashi; Tatsutoshi Nakahata
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 10.  Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants.

Authors:  Ellen Meijer; Greet J Boland; Leo F Verdonck
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.