Literature DB >> 20336388

Prospective assessment of postoperative complications and associated costs following inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients.

Sharon B Chang1, Robert L Askew, Yan Xing, Storm Weaver, Jeffrey E Gershenwald, Jeffrey E Lee, Richard Royal, Anthony Lucci, Merrick I Ross, Janice N Cormier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We prospectively assessed the incidence, risk factors, and costs associated with wound complications and lymphedema in melanoma patients undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 53 melanoma patients were accrued to 2 trials (June 2005 to July 2008) that included prospective evaluations of postoperative complications; 30-day wound complications included infection, seroma, and/or dehiscence. There were 20 patients who underwent limb volume measurement and completed a 19-item lymphedema symptom assessment questionnaire preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate potential risk factors for complications. A microcosting analysis was also performed to evaluate the direct costs associated with wound complications.
RESULTS: The 30-day wound complications were noted in 77.4% of patients. A BMI ≥ 30 (n = 28) increased the risk for wound complications (odds ratio [OR] = 11.4, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.6-78.5, P = .01), while advanced nodal disease approached significance (OR = 9.0, 95%CI: 0.79-103.1, P = .08). Other risk factors, including diabetes, smoking, and the addition of a deep pelvic (iliac/obturator) dissection to ILND, were not significant. Of 20 patients, 9 (45%) developed limb volume change (LVC) ≥5% at 3 months, with associated mean symptom scores of 6.1 versus 4.6 for those without LVC. Costs for patients with wound complications were significantly higher than for those without wound complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative wound complications and early onset lymphedema occur frequently following ILND for melanoma. Obesity is an adverse risk factor for 30-day wound complications that can significantly increase postoperative costs, as is likely the case for advanced disease. Risk reduction practices and novel treatment approaches are needed to reduce postoperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20336388      PMCID: PMC2943041          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1026-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  56 in total

1.  Radical lymph node dissection for melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan W Serpell; Peter W G Carne; Michael Bailey
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.872

2.  Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Olivier Bouchot; Jérome Rigaud; Frédéric Maillet; Jean François Hetet; Georges Karam
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  The surgery of 'inguino-femoral' lymph nodes: is it adequate or excessive?

Authors:  C N Hudson; H Shulver; D C Lowe
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Adverse alteration of wound flora with topical negative-pressure therapy: a case report.

Authors:  D L Chester; R Waters
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2002-09

5.  Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience.

Authors:  Richard Bevan-Thomas; Joel W Slaton; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Obesity: impediment to postsurgical wound healing.

Authors:  Joyce A Wilson; Jan J Clark
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.347

7.  Operative morbidity associated with groin dissections.

Authors:  Hitoshi Tonouchi; Yukinari Ohmori; Minako Kobayashi; Naomi Konishi; Kouji Tanaka; Yasuhiko Mohri; Hitoshi Mizutani; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Postoperative complications after vulvectomy and inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy using separate groin incisions.

Authors:  K N Gaarenstroom; G G Kenter; J B Trimbos; I Agous; F Amant; A A W Peters; I Vergote
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Predicting breast cancer-related lymphedema using self-reported symptoms.

Authors:  Jane M Armer; M Elise Radina; Davina Porock; Scott D Culbertson
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  A gelatin matrix-thrombin tissue sealant (FloSeal) application in the management of groin breakdown after inguinal lymphadenectomy for vulvar cancer.

Authors:  L Y Han; V Schimp; J C Oh; P T Ramirez
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.437

View more
  25 in total

1.  Sensitivity of Preference-Based Quality-of-Life Measures for Economic Evaluations in Early-Stage Melanoma.

Authors:  Mbathio Dieng; Nadine A Kasparian; Anne E Cust; Daniel S J Costa; Anh Tran; Phyllis N Butow; Scott W Menzies; Graham J Mann; Rachael L Morton
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  Effectiveness of intraoperative indocyanine-green fluorescence angiography during inguinal lymph node dissection for skin cancer to prevent postoperative wound dehiscence.

Authors:  Hiroshi Furukawa; Toshihiko Hayashi; Akihiko Oyama; Emi Funayama; Naoki Murao; Takeshi Yamao; Yuhei Yamamoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Management of Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Danil V Makarov
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

4.  Safety and Feasibility of Minimally Invasive Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Melanoma (SAFE-MILND): Report of a Prospective Multi-institutional Trial.

Authors:  James W Jakub; Alicia M Terando; Amod Sarnaik; Charlotte E Ariyan; Mark B Faries; Sabino Zani; Heather B Neuman; Nabil Wasif; Jeffrey M Farma; Bruce J Averbook; Karl Y Bilimoria; Travis E Grotz; Jacob B Jake Allred; Vera J Suman; Mary Sue Brady; Douglas Tyler; Jeffrey D Wayne; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Robot-assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for melanoma.

Authors:  Alexis Sánchez; Rene Sotelo; Omaira Rodriguez; Renata Sánchez; José Rosciano; Luis Medina; Liumariel Vegas
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-12

6.  Dissections of regional lymph nodes for treatment of skin cancer: predicting annual caseloads that will optimise outcomes.

Authors:  J K Dickson; A Davies; S Rahman; C Sethu; J R O Smith; A Orlando; D Ayers
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Wound complications after inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma: is ACS NSQIP adequate?

Authors:  Carly E Glarner; David Y Greenblatt; Robert J Rettammel; Heather B Neuman; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Variability in melanoma post-treatment surveillance practices by country and physician specialty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kate D Cromwell; Merrick I Ross; Yan Xing; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard E Royal; Anthony Lucci; Jeffrey E Lee; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in malignant melanoma: safe in pregnancy?

Authors:  James R Davis; Steven D Trocha; Allyson L Hale; Mackenzie J Bartz
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-11-05

10.  Lymphatic abnormalities in the normal contralateral arms of subjects with breast cancer-related lymphedema as assessed by near-infrared fluorescent imaging.

Authors:  Melissa B Aldrich; Renie Guilliod; Caroline E Fife; Erik A Maus; Latisha Smith; John C Rasmussen; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.