Literature DB >> 17151845

Arthroscopic removal of an intramedullary nail in the humerus.

Kyung Cheon Kim1, Kwang Jin Rhee, Hyun Dae Shin, Young Mo Kim.   

Abstract

The most frequent criticism of antegrade humeral nailing is its potentially deleterious effect on shoulder function owing to the trauma to the rotator cuff at the insertion point. This problem may also occur when removing an intramedullary nail from the humerus. In an effort to decrease the trauma to the rotator cuff at the nail insertion site during removal of an intramedullary nail from the humerus and to allow recovery of shoulder function as soon as possible after removal, we performed arthroscopic removal of the intramedullary nail and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The advantages of this method include the fact that it is a less invasive approach, which causes minimal disruption of the rotator cuff, requires fewer days in hospital, and allows simultaneous arthroscopic correction of the accompanying lesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17151845     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0229-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  5 in total

Review 1.  Transitioning to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the pros and cons.

Authors:  Ken Yamaguchi; William N Levine; Guido Marra; Leesa M Galatz; Steven Klepps; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2003

2.  Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with humeral locked nail and comparison with plate fixation.

Authors:  J Lin
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-05

3.  Antegrade interlocking nailing of acute humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  J Crates; A P Whittle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Recovery of shoulder joint function after humeral shaft fracture: a comparative study between antegrade intramedullary nailing and plate fixation.

Authors:  Tapio Flinkkilä; Pekka Hyvönen; Pertti Siira; Martti Hämäläinen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Fixation stability of comminuted humeral shaft fractures: locked intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation.

Authors:  Andrew L Chen; Thomas N Joseph; Phillip R Wolinksy; Nirmal C Tejwani; Frederick J Kummer; Kenneth A Egol; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-10
  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  [Technique and value of arthroscopic implant removal in the shoulder].

Authors:  H Lill; C Katthagen; C Voigt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Shoulder arthroscopy combined to hardware removal in proximal humeral fractures: a series of 58 cases with a mean follow-up of 2 years.

Authors:  Ch Maroun; D Aliani; A Hass; J D Werthel; Anne Vidil; Ph Valenti
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-13

3.  The feasibility and results of an arthroscopic removal of humeral locking plates and glenohumeral arthrolysis after proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Ali Maqdes; Bruno Levy; Shahnaz Klouche; Philippe Hardy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Failure and revision rates of proximal humeral fracture treatment with the use of a standardized treatment algorithm at a level-1 trauma center.

Authors:  Jan Christoph Katthagen; Meret Huber; Svenja Grabowski; Alexander Ellwein; Gunnar Jensen; Helmut Lill
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-18

5.  A novel implant removal technique by endoscopy.

Authors:  Chang Heng Liu; Wen Lin Yeh; Ping Jui Tsai; Kuo Feng Fan; Hung Wei Cheng; Jian Ming Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Outcomes of Mini-Invasive Arthroscopic Arthrolysis Combined with Locking Screw and/or Intramedullary Nail Extraction after Osteosynthesis of the Proximal Humerus Fracture.

Authors:  Roman Madeja; Jana Pometlová; Roman Brzóska; Jiří Voves; Lubor Bialy; Leopold Pleva; Jan Stránský; Adéla Vrtková; Jaroslav Janošek; Kristýna Čabanová
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.