Irene Figà-Talamanca1. 1. Department of Hygiene and Industrial Health, University of Rome 'La Sapienza', Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy. irene.figatalamanca@uniroma1.it
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This in-depth review summarizes and interprets the available recent epidemiologic evidence on the relationship between occupational exposures and negative reproductive outcome among women workers. METHODS: The studies examined by the review include those published in the international scientific literature since 1990, and were identified through the search of relevant data banks using selected keywords. RESULTS: From the examination of studies dealing with exposures of women to chemical agents, pesticides, physical agents, ergonomic factors and stress, it appears that at present the evidence is sufficient to warrant the maximum protection of pregnant women to several well-documented occupational risk factors. These include exposures to anaesthetic gases, antineoplastic drugs, heavy metals, solvents, heavy physical work and irregular work schedules. For other work risks, such as exposure to non-ionizing radiation and psychosocial work stress, the evidence is often suggestive but not conclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Policy makers and health professionals should advise women and employers to avoid exposure to the well-known occupational risk factors, while epidemiologic research should pursue methodological improvements and provide more insight into the magnitude of exposures responsible for detrimental effects.
BACKGROUND: This in-depth review summarizes and interprets the available recent epidemiologic evidence on the relationship between occupational exposures and negative reproductive outcome among women workers. METHODS: The studies examined by the review include those published in the international scientific literature since 1990, and were identified through the search of relevant data banks using selected keywords. RESULTS: From the examination of studies dealing with exposures of women to chemical agents, pesticides, physical agents, ergonomic factors and stress, it appears that at present the evidence is sufficient to warrant the maximum protection of pregnant women to several well-documented occupational risk factors. These include exposures to anaesthetic gases, antineoplastic drugs, heavy metals, solvents, heavy physical work and irregular work schedules. For other work risks, such as exposure to non-ionizing radiation and psychosocial work stress, the evidence is often suggestive but not conclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Policy makers and health professionals should advise women and employers to avoid exposure to the well-known occupational risk factors, while epidemiologic research should pursue methodological improvements and provide more insight into the magnitude of exposures responsible for detrimental effects.
Authors: Ana M García; M Carmen González-Galarzo; Elena Ronda; Ferran Ballester; Marisa Estarlich; Mònica Guxens; Aitana Lertxundia; Begoña Martinez-Argüelles; Loreto Santa Marina; Adonina Tardón; Martine Vrijheid Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Elena Ronda; Bente E Moen; Ana M García; José Sánchez-Paya; Valborg Baste Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Carine J Sakr; Oyebode A Taiwo; Deron H Galusha; Martin D Slade; Martha G Fiellin; Felicia Bayer; David A Savitz; Mark R Cullen Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Mary Kate M Lane; Mahlet Garedew; Emma C Deary; Cherish N Coleman; Melissa M Ahrens-Víquez; Hanno C Erythropel; Julie B Zimmerman; Paul T Anastas Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 3.739