| Literature DB >> 17149533 |
Ian L Flanigan1, John K MacLeod, John F Williams.
Abstract
A GC/EIMS/SIM methodology has been developed to re-examine the path ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17149533 PMCID: PMC1779625 DOI: 10.1007/s11120-006-9114-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Photosynth Res ISSN: 0166-8595 Impact factor: 3.573
Fig. 1The path of carbon in photosynthesis (Calvin 1956). Each asterisk (*) represents a carbon atom labelled during one turn of the cycle. For explanation of abbreviations, see preceding paper
Sugar calibration factorsa
| Sugar | Intercept | Slope | Coefficient of correlation ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erythrose | −0.017 | 1.068 | 0.999 |
| Ribose/Arabinose | 0.001 | 0.625 | 0.998 |
| Xylulose/Ribulose | −0.010 | 1.077 | 0.999 |
| Fructose | −0.008 | 0.305 | 0.995 |
| Glucose | −0.011 | 0.524 | 0.998 |
| Sedoheptulose | −0.013 | 0.678 | 0.998 |
| D- | −0.009 | 0.318 | 0.996 |
| D- | −0.005 | 0.177 | 0.992 |
aErythritol used as internal standard
Enrichment resultsa for 45 s experiment No. 2 in the leaf disc oxygen electrode
| Sugar | Carbons | 13C0 | 13C1 | 13C2 | 13C3 | 13C4 | 13C5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xylose | 160 | C1-2 | 67.2 | 24.2 | 8.6 | |||
| 205 | C4-5 | 80.3 | 19.7 | |||||
| 262 | C1-3 | 51.0 | 26.8 | 13.4 | 8.9 | |||
| 307 | C3-5 | 61.2 | 21.5 | 12.5 | 4.7 | |||
| 452 | C1-5 | 47.1 | 21.7 | 17.9 | 13.3 | |||
| Lyxose/Arabinoseb | 160 | C1-2 | 66.7 | 24.8 | 8.5 | |||
| 262 | C1-3 | 55.5 | 30.7 | 13.7 | ||||
| 307 | C3-5 | 68.5 | 18.9 | 12.6 | ||||
| Xylulose | 205d | C4-5 | 90.3 | 5.6 | 4.1 | |||
| 263 | C1-3 | 54.6 | 26.5 | 13.5 | 5.4 | |||
| 364 | C1-4 | 50.0 | 23.8 | 15.5 | 8.1 | 2.5 | ||
| 452 | C1-5 | 46.5 | 22.1 | 16.9 | 9.9 | 3.9 | 0.8 | |
| Ribose/Ribulosec | 160 | C1-2 | 67.0 | 24.7 | 8.3 | |||
| 205d | C4-5 | 81.9 | 11.7 | 6.4 | ||||
| 262/3e | C1-3 | 59.1 | 23.1 | 12.7 | 5.1 | |||
| 307 | C3-5 | 66.1 | 17.6 | 11.0 | 5.3 | |||
| 319 | C2-5 | 50.4 | 24.1 | 14.7 | 7.9 | 2.8 | ||
| Fructose | 205 | C5-6 | 89.5 | 10.5 | ||||
| 263 | C1-3 | 65.9 | 17.8 | 11.6 | 4.8 | |||
| 307 | C4-6 | 68.2 | 16.9 | 10.1 | 4.8 | |||
| 319 | C3-6 | 58.6 | 20.3 | 11.8 | 6.4 | 2.9 | ||
| 364 | C1-4 | 49.6 | 22.3 | 16.2 | 8.7 | 3.2 | ||
| Glucose | 160 | C1-2 | 73.6 | 19.2 | 7.2 | |||
| 205d | C5-6 | 78.0 | 14.6 | 7.4 | ||||
| 307f | C4-6 | 60.9 | 21.5 | 11.6 | 6.1 | |||
| 319 | C3-6 | 36.5 | 23.1 | 22.2 | 12.9 | 5.3 | ||
| 364 | C1-4 | 33.2 | 27.3 | 22.2 | 12.5 | 4.9 | ||
| Unidentified heptulose | 307 | C5-7 | 57.4 | 22.6 | 12.9 | 7.1 | ||
| 319 | C4-7 | 26.3 | 27.0 | 25.6 | 15.0 | 6.1 | ||
| 421 | C3-7 | 24.3 | 24.5 | 24.1 | 16.3 | 8.0 | 2.8 | |
| Sedoheptulose | 205d | C6-7 | 72.4 | 19.4 | 8.3 | |||
| 262 | C1-3 | 41.4 | 29.6 | 17.3 | 9.0 | 2.6 | ||
| 307f | C5-7 | 52.0 | 25.1 | 15.0 | 7.9 | |||
| 319 | C4-7 | 25.5 | 26.0 | 25.6 | 16.2 | 6.7 | ||
| 364 | C1-4 | 31.7 | 27.4 | 22.5 | 13.2 | 5.3 | ||
| 466 | C1-5 | 17.0 | 21.5 | 26.2 | 20.0 | 10.7 | 4.5 | |
| Octulose | 205d | C7-8 | 78.6 | 14.1 | 7.4 | |||
| 307f | C6-8 | 58.2 | 22.9 | 12.7 | 6.3 | |||
| 319 | C5-8 | 41.8 | 25.2 | 19.2 | 10.2 | 3.6 | ||
| 331 | C4-8 | 31.2 | 21.5 | 21.3 | 14.5 | 7.8 | 3.8 | |
| 421 | C4-8 | 33.6 | 21.5 | 21.0 | 14.4 | 6.9 | 2.6 | |
| 466 | C1-5 | 34.6 | 22.3 | 21.5 | 13.3 | 6.0 | 2.3 |
aAfter correction for natural abundance of 2H, 13C, 15N, 18O, 29, 30Si and contributions from some neighbouring ions. Results represent an average of at least three consecutive GC/MS runs. Standard deviations for most sugars were <1% and for the less abundant sugars (xylose, arabinose/lyxose, octulose and unidentified heptulose), standard deviations were <2%. When significantly different enrichments were measured for the syn and anti-methoxime isomers, it was assumed that some interference was present causing the higher result and the one showing the lower enrichment was used; otherwise both syn and anti-isomers where present were used in the calculations
bLyxose/Arabinose refers to either one or both sugars which could not be separated on the capillary GC column used in these analyses
cRibose/Ribulose refers to both sugars, which, although they could not be resolved were both shown to be present from their characteristic mass spectra (MacLeod et al. 2001)
dThe intensity of the m/z 207 ion is enhanced due to column bleed, despite background correction
eThe MS of Ribose contains a small m/z 262 ion while that of Ribulose has a large m/z 263 ion
fThe m/z 305 ion contributes to m/z 307 and 308. No correction has been made for this
Chloroplast metabolite concentrations (nmol (mg chl)−1)
| Equipment for experiment | Apparatus | Leaf disc oxygen electrode | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure to 13CO2 (sec:) | 0 | 30 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 30 | 45 | ||
| Compound | Blanka | Blanka | Controlb | No 1 | No 2 | No 1 | No 2 | ||
| Erythrosec | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.55 | 0.79 | 0.35 |
| Xylose | 0.00 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 1.10 | 0.61 |
| Lyxose/Arabinose | 0.00 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.05 | 0.68 | 0.81 |
| Ribose/Ribulose/Xylulose | 0.20 | 5.74 | 0.21 | 1.86 | 4.70 | 2.54 | 9.79 | 14.87 | 6.61 |
| Fructose | 0.29 | 33.71 | 0.31 | 2.67 | 29.66 | 23.48 | 42.06 | 117.6 | 58.43 |
| Glucose | 0.33 | 10.55 | 0.35 | 6.71 | 8.21 | 3.60 | 15.63 | 39.38 | 16.18 |
| Unidentified heptulose | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 1.04 | 0.84 |
| Sedoheptulose | 0.01 | 9.04 | 0.01 | 1.06 | 12.97 | 1.17 | 21.95 | 38.90 | 16.26 |
| D- | 0.000 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.53 | 3.53 | d |
aExtract containing chloroplast medium without chloroplasts
b45 s exposure to 13CO2 in the dark
cTentatively identified
dm/z 147 ion not monitored
Atom% excess 13C in individual carbons and 13C enrichments in C2 moietiesa
| Carbon | Xylose | Lyxose | Xylulose | Ribose | Fructose | Glucose | Sedoheptulose | Unk. Heptulose | Octulose | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-1 | { | 24.2, | { | 24.8, | – | 12.1 | – | { | 19.2, | – | – | – | ||||
| C-2 | 8.6 | 8.5 | – | 23.8 | – | 7.2 | – | – | – | |||||||
| C-3 | 23.7/24.1b | 16.7 | – | 24.5d | 14.1 | 40.1c | – | 7.6 | – | |||||||
| C-4 | { | 19.7d, | – | 8.4 | { | 12.5d, | 23.8/24.7b | 27.5 | 23.6/51b,c | 54.2 | 25.0 | |||||
| C-5 | 0 | – | 7.1 | 0 | { | 10.5, | { | 16d, | 46.3/34.1b,c,d | – | 28.2c | |||||
| C-6 | 0 | 0 | { | 21.1d | – | 31.2d | ||||||||||
| C-7 | 0 | { | 15.4,d | |||||||||||||
| C-8 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
aA dash implies that the value could not be measured as a one- or two-carbon unit
bCalculated from two separate sets of data, e.g. C1-3 minus C1-2 and C3-5 minus C4-5 both give a value for C3 of Xylose
cNot corrected for contribution of m/z 305 to the m/z 307 cluster
dm/z 207 from residual column bleed taken as zero in m/z 205 cluster
Fig. 2An extension of the Calvin pathway by the inclusion of an octulose phosphate shunt (vide infra). Each asterisk (*) represents a carbon atom labelled during one turn of the cycle. Sugar phosphates in red represent those participating in the octulose shunt. For explanation of abbreviations, see preceding paper