OBJECTIVE: To examine how type and severity of patients' negative emotions influence oncologists' responses and subsequent conversations. METHODS: We analyzed 264 audio-recorded conversations between advanced cancer patients and their oncologists. Conversations were coded for patients' expressions of negative emotion, which were categorized by type of emotion and severity. Oncologists' responses were coded as using either empathic language or blocking and distancing approaches. RESULTS: Patients presented fear more often than anger or sadness; severity of disclosures was most often moderate. Oncologists responded to 35% of these negative emotional disclosures with empathic language. They were most empathic when patients presented intense emotions. Responding empathically to patients' emotional disclosures lengthened discussions by an average of only 21s. CONCLUSION: Greater response rates to severe emotions suggest oncologists may recognize negative emotions better when patients express them more intensely. Oncologists were least responsive to patient fear and responded with greatest empathy to sadness. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Oncologists may benefit from additional training to recognize negative emotions, even when displayed without intensity. Teaching cancer patients to better articulate their emotional concerns may also enhance patient-oncologist communication.
OBJECTIVE: To examine how type and severity of patients' negative emotions influence oncologists' responses and subsequent conversations. METHODS: We analyzed 264 audio-recorded conversations between advanced cancerpatients and their oncologists. Conversations were coded for patients' expressions of negative emotion, which were categorized by type of emotion and severity. Oncologists' responses were coded as using either empathic language or blocking and distancing approaches. RESULTS:Patients presented fear more often than anger or sadness; severity of disclosures was most often moderate. Oncologists responded to 35% of these negative emotional disclosures with empathic language. They were most empathic when patients presented intense emotions. Responding empathically to patients' emotional disclosures lengthened discussions by an average of only 21s. CONCLUSION: Greater response rates to severe emotions suggest oncologists may recognize negative emotions better when patients express them more intensely. Oncologists were least responsive to patient fear and responded with greatest empathy to sadness. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Oncologists may benefit from additional training to recognize negative emotions, even when displayed without intensity. Teaching cancerpatients to better articulate their emotional concerns may also enhance patient-oncologist communication.
Authors: Kathryn I Pollak; Robert M Arnold; Amy S Jeffreys; Stewart C Alexander; Maren K Olsen; Amy P Abernethy; Celette Sugg Skinner; Keri L Rodriguez; James A Tulsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert Gramling; Sally Norton; Susan Ladwig; Paul Winters; Maureen Metzger; Timothy Quill; Stewart Alexander Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Ian Hsu; Somnath Saha; Phillip Todd Korthuis; Victoria Sharp; Jonathon Cohn; Richard D Moore; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2012-07-18
Authors: Stewart C Alexander; Amy M Sullivan; Anthony L Back; James A Tulsky; Roberta E Goldman; Susan D Block; Susan K Stewart; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Stephanie J Lee Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Stewart C Alexander; Susan Ladwig; Sally A Norton; David Gramling; J Kelly Davis; Maureen Metzger; Jane DeLuca; Robert Gramling Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Kathryn I Pollak; Robert Arnold; Stewart C Alexander; Amy S Jeffreys; Maren K Olsen; Amy P Abernethy; Keri L Rodriguez; James A Tulsky Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-10-18 Impact factor: 3.603