Literature DB >> 17148389

Heterosis, the catapult effect and establishment success of a colonizing bird.

John M Drake1.   

Abstract

The genetic basis of population colonization is poorly understood, particularly in animals. Here, I introduce the idea of a 'catapult effect' to explain how the effects of transient increases in fitness can be retained in population demography diminishing the chance of extinction. I tested this idea using information on historical introductions of hybrid and non-hybrid pheasants in the United States. I found that hybrid pheasants were 2.2 times more likely to establish than non-hybrid strains. Analysis of fitness components failed to support the alternative that the increased odds of establishment resulted from increased genetic variation conferring permanent fitness benefits through directional selection or by purging deleterious alleles. These results show that even ephemeral increases in fitness can affect the persistence of small populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148389      PMCID: PMC1618900          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  9 in total

1.  Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants?

Authors:  N C Ellstrand; K A Schierenbeck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evidence of hybridity in invasive watermilfoil (Myriophyllum) populations.

Authors:  Michael L Moody; Donald H Les
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Introduced species and their missing parasites.

Authors:  Mark E Torchin; Kevin D Lafferty; Andrew P Dobson; Valerie J McKenzie; Armand M Kuris
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds.

Authors:  Phillip Cassey; Tim M Blackburn; Daniel Sol; Richard P Duncan; Julie L Lockwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions.

Authors:  Julie L Lockwood; Phillip Cassey; Tim Blackburn
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-27       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Hybrid zone dynamics and species replacement between Orconectes crayfishes in a northern Wisconsin lake.

Authors:  W L Perry; J L Feder; G Dwyer; D M Lodge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Heterosis and outbreeding depression in descendants of natural immigrants to an inbred population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia).

Authors:  Amy B Marr; Lukas F Keller; Peter Arcese
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species.

Authors:  N D Tsutsui; A V Suarez; D A Holway; T J Case
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total
  17 in total

Review 1.  Population admixture, biological invasions and the balance between local adaptation and inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Koen J F Verhoeven; Mirka Macel; Lorne M Wolfe; Arjen Biere
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The roles of demography and genetics in the early stages of colonization.

Authors:  Marianna Szűcs; Brett A Melbourne; Ty Tuff; Ruth A Hufbauer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Hybridization as a facilitator of species range expansion.

Authors:  Karin S Pfennig; Audrey L Kelly; Amanda A Pierce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Beyond propagule pressure: importance of selection during the transport stage of biological invasions.

Authors:  Elizabeta Briski; Farrah T Chan; John A Darling; Velda Lauringson; Hugh J MacIsaac; Aibin Zhan; Sarah A Bailey
Journal:  Front Ecol Environ       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 11.123

5.  Admixture between native and invasive populations may increase invasiveness of Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  Mark van Kleunen; Michael Röckle; Marc Stift
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion.

Authors:  Brittany S Barker; Janelle E Cocio; Samantha R Anderson; Joseph E Braasch; Feng A Cang; Heather D Gillette; Katrina M Dlugosch
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 7.  Biological invasions, climate change and genomics.

Authors:  Steven L Chown; Kathryn A Hodgins; Philippa C Griffin; John G Oakeshott; Margaret Byrne; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Vegetative and Adaptive Traits Predict Different Outcomes for Restoration Using Hybrids.

Authors:  Philip A Crystal; Nathanael I Lichti; Keith E Woeste; Douglass F Jacobs
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Genetic admixture and heterosis may enhance the invasiveness of common ragweed.

Authors:  Min A Hahn; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  No clear effect of admixture between two European invading outbreaks of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera in natura.

Authors:  Gérald Bermond; Fanny Cavigliasso; Sophie Mallez; Joseph Spencer; Thomas Guillemaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.