Literature DB >> 19324609

Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation.

W Edwin Harris1, Tobias Uller.   

Abstract

Reproductive investment decisions form an integral part of life-history biology. Selection frequently favours plasticity in investment that can generate maternal effects on offspring development. For example, if females differentially allocate resources based on mate attractiveness or quality, this can create a non-genetic link between mate attractiveness and offspring fitness with potential consequences for ecological and evolutionary dynamics. It is therefore important to understand under what conditions differential investment into offspring in relation to male quality is expected to occur and the direction of the effect. Two opposite predictions, increased investment into offspring produced with high-quality mates (differential allocation (DA)) and increased investment with low-quality males (reproductive compensation (RC)) have been suggested but no formal theoretical treatment justifying the assumptions underlying these two hypotheses has been conducted to date. Here, we used a state-based approach to investigate the circumstances under which the variation in mate quality results in differential female investment into offspring and how this interacts with female energetic resource levels. We found that a pattern of increased investment when mating with high-quality mates (i.e. DA) was the most common optimal investment strategy for females in our model. By contrast, increased investment when mating with low-quality mates (i.e. RC) was predicted only when the relative impact of parental investment on offspring quality was low. Finally, we found that the specific pattern of investment in relation to male quality depends on female energetic state, the likelihood for future mating opportunities and the expected future distribution of mate quality. Thus, the female's age and body condition should be important factors mediating DA and RC, which may help to explain the equivocal results of empirical studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324609      PMCID: PMC2666688          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  21 in total

1.  Early development and fitness in birds and mammals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Cryptic female choice: frogs reduce clutch size when amplexed by undesired males.

Authors:  H U Reyer; G Frei; C Som
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Females produce larger eggs for large males in a paternal mouthbrooding fish.

Authors:  N Kolm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus.

Authors:  Janne S Kotiaho; Leigh W Simmons; John Hunt; Joseph L Tomkins
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Maternal effects influence the sexual behavior of sons and daughters in the zebra finch.

Authors:  Wolfgang Forstmeier; Dave W Coltman; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Conflict between parents over care.

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston; Tamás Székely; John M McNamara
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Maternal effects due to male attractiveness affect offspring development in the zebra finch.

Authors:  L Gilbert; K A Williamson; N Hazon; J A Graves
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Wyatt W Anderson; Cynthia K Bluhm; Lee C Drickamer; Yong-Kyu Kim; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Differential sex allocation in sand lizards: bright males induce daughter production in a species with heteromorphic sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Mats Olsson; Erik Wapstra; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Parental effects in ecology and evolution: mechanisms, processes and implications.

Authors:  Alexander V Badyaev; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Maternal effects in cooperative breeders: from hymenopterans to humans.

Authors:  Andrew F Russell; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Evolution of maternal effects: past and present.

Authors:  Timothy A Mousseau; Tobias Uller; Erik Wapstra; Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Strategic female reproductive investment in response to male attractiveness in birds.

Authors:  Terézia Horváthová; Shinichi Nakagawa; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Epigenetics and the origins of paternal effects.

Authors:  James P Curley; Rahia Mashoodh; Frances A Champagne
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Females allocate differentially to offspring size and number in response to male effects on female and offspring fitness.

Authors:  Holly K Kindsvater; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Postnatal nutrition influences male attractiveness and promotes plasticity in male mating preferences.

Authors:  José C Noguera; Neil B Metcalfe; Pat Monaghan
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-11-14

8.  Evolution of sexual cooperation from sexual conflict.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; John M Powers; Russell Lande; Trevor D Price
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Male genotype influences female reproductive investment in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Andrew D Stewart; Monica K Little; William R Rice
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Reproductive consequences of farmland heterogeneity in little owls (Athene noctua).

Authors:  Vanja T Michel; Beat Naef-Daenzer; Herbert Keil; Martin U Grüebler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.