Literature DB >> 17148058

Insect walking is based on a decentralized architecture revealing a simple and robust controller.

Holk Cruse1, Volker Dürr, Josef Schmitz.   

Abstract

Control of walking in rugged terrain requires one to incorporate different issues, such as the mechanical properties of legs and muscles, the neuronal control structures for the single leg, the mechanics and neuronal control structures for the coordination between legs, as well as central decisions that are based on external information and on internal states. Walking in predictable environments and fast running, to a large degree, rely on muscle mechanics. Conversely, slow walking in unpredictable terrain, e.g. climbing in rugged structures, has to rely on neuronal systems that monitor and intelligently react to specific properties of the environment. An arthropod model system that shows the latter abilities is the stick insect, based on which this review will be focused. An insect, when moving its six legs, has to control 18 joints, three per leg, and therefore has to control 18 degrees of freedom (d.f.). As the body position in space is determined by 6 d.f. only, there are 12 d.f. open to be selected. Therefore, a fundamental problem is as to how these extra d.f. are controlled. Based mainly on behavioural experiments and simulation studies, but also including neurophysiological results, the following control structures have been revealed. Legs act as basically independent systems. The quasi-rhythmic movement of the individual leg can be described to result from a structure that exploits mechanical coupling of the legs via the ground and the body. Furthermore, neuronally mediated influences act locally between neighbouring legs, leading to the emergence of insect-type gaits. The underlying controller can be described as a free gait controller. Cooperation of the legs being in stance mode is assumed to be based on mechanical coupling plus local positive feedback controllers. These controllers, acting on individual leg joints, transform a passive displacement of a joint into an active movement, generating synergistic assistance reflexes in all mechanically coupled joints. This architecture is summarized in the form of the artificial neural network, Walknet, that is heavily dependent on sensory feedback at the proprioceptive level. Exteroceptive feedback is exploited for global decisions, such as the walking direction and velocity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17148058     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  15 in total

1.  Shifts in a single muscle's control potential of body dynamics are determined by mechanical feedback.

Authors:  Simon Sponberg; Thomas Libby; Chris H Mullens; Robert J Full
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A single muscle's multifunctional control potential of body dynamics for postural control and running.

Authors:  Simon Sponberg; Andrew J Spence; Chris H Mullens; Robert J Full
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Kinematic and behavioral evidence for a distinction between trotting and ambling gaits in the cockroach Blaberus discoidalis.

Authors:  John A Bender; Elaine M Simpson; Brian R Tietz; Kathryn A Daltorio; Roger D Quinn; Roy E Ritzmann
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  NeuroMechFly, a neuromechanical model of adult Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Shravan Tata Ramalingasetty; Pembe Gizem Özdil; Victor Lobato-Rios; Jonathan Arreguit; Auke Jan Ijspeert; Pavan Ramdya
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Crawling at High Speeds: Steady Level Locomotion in the Spider Cupiennius salei-Global Kinematics and Implications for Centre of Mass Dynamics.

Authors:  Tom Weihmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spinal circuits can accommodate interaction torques during multijoint limb movements.

Authors:  Thomas Buhrmann; Ezequiel A Di Paolo
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Kinematic responses to changes in walking orientation and gravitational load in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  César S Mendes; Soumya V Rajendren; Imre Bartos; Szabolcs Márka; Richard S Mann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Quantification of gait parameters in freely walking wild type and sensory deprived Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  César S Mendes; Imre Bartos; Turgay Akay; Szabolcs Márka; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Neural control and adaptive neural forward models for insect-like, energy-efficient, and adaptable locomotion of walking machines.

Authors:  Poramate Manoonpong; Ulrich Parlitz; Florentin Wörgötter
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Advantage of straight walk instability in turning maneuver of multilegged locomotion: a robotics approach.

Authors:  Shinya Aoi; Takahiro Tanaka; Soichiro Fujiki; Tetsuro Funato; Kei Senda; Kazuo Tsuchiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.