Literature DB >> 17145400

Considerations in applying 3D PRESS H-1 brain MRSI with an eight-channel phased-array coil at 3 T.

Yan Li1, Joseph A Osorio, Esin Ozturk-Isik, Albert P Chen, Duan Xu, Jason C Crane, Soonmee Cha, Susan Chang, Mitchel S Berger, Daniel B Vigneron, Sarah J Nelson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the benefits of a 3 T scanner and an eight-channel phased-array head coil for acquiring three-dimensional PRESS (Point REsolved Spectral Selection) proton (H-1) magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) data from the brains of volunteers and patients with brain tumors relative to previous studies that used a 1.5 T scanner and a quadrature head coil. Issues that were of concern included differences in chemical shift artifacts, line broadening due to increased susceptibility at higher field strengths, changes in relaxation times and the increased complexity of the postprocessing software due to the need for combining signals from the multichannel data. Simulated and phantom spectra showed that very selective suppression pulses with a thickness of 40 mm and an overpress factor of at least 1.2 are needed to reduce chemical shift artifact and lipid contamination at higher field strengths. Spectral data from a phantom and those from six volunteers demonstrated that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the eight-channel coil was more than 50% higher than that in the quadrature head coil. For healthy volunteers and eight patients with brain tumors, the SNR at 3 T with the eight-channel coil was on average 1.5 times higher relative to the eight-channel coil at 1.5 T in voxels from normal-appearing brains. In combination with the effect of a higher field strength, the use of the eight-channel coil was able to provide an increase in the SNR of more than 2.33 times the corresponding acquisition at 1.5 T with a quadrature head coil. This is expected to be critical for clinical applications of MRSI in patients with brain tumors because it can be used to either decrease acquisition time or improve spatial resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17145400     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  21 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Will Brindle; Ana M Casado; Kirsten Shuler; Moira Henderson; Brenda Thomas; Jennifer Macfarlane; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Katherine Lymer; Zoe Morris; Cyril Pernet; William Nailon; Trevor Ahearn; Abdul Nashirudeen Mumuni; Carlos Mugruza; John McLean; Goultchira Chakirova; Yuehui Terry Tao; Johanna Simpson; Andrew C Stanfield; Harriet Johnston; Jehill Parikh; Natalie A Royle; Janet De Wilde; Mark E Bastin; Nick Weir; Andrew Farrall; Maria C Valdes Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Fully automated atlas-based method for prescribing 3D PRESS MR spectroscopic imaging: Toward robust and reproducible metabolite measurements in human brain.

Authors:  Wei Bian; Yan Li; Jason C Crane; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Association of early changes in 1H MRSI parameters with survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving a multimodality treatment regimen.

Authors:  Sarah J Nelson; Achuta K Kadambi; Ilwoo Park; Yan Li; Jason Crane; Marram Olson; Annette Molinaro; Ritu Roy; Nicholas Butowski; Soonmee Cha; Susan Chang
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Post-processing correction of the endorectal coil reception effects in MR spectroscopic imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  Susan M Noworolski; Galen D Reed; John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Evaluation of MR markers that predict survival in patients with newly diagnosed GBM prior to adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Suja Saraswathy; Forrest W Crawford; Kathleen R Lamborn; Andrea Pirzkall; Susan Chang; Soonmee Cha; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Comparison of T(1) and T(2) metabolite relaxation times in glioma and normal brain at 3T.

Authors:  Yan Li; Radhika Srinivasan; Helene Ratiney; Ying Lu; Susan M Chang; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Strategies for rapid in vivo 1H and hyperpolarized 13C MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Sarah J Nelson; Eugene Ozhinsky; Yan Li; Il woo Park; Jason Crane
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  3D sensitivity encoded ellipsoidal MR spectroscopic imaging of gliomas at 3T.

Authors:  Esin Ozturk-Isik; Albert P Chen; Jason C Crane; Wei Bian; Duan Xu; Eric T Han; Susan M Chang; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  (1)H spectroscopic imaging of human brain at 3 Tesla: comparison of fast three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging techniques.

Authors:  Matthew L Zierhut; Esin Ozturk-Isik; Albert P Chen; Ilwoo Park; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Design of cosine modulated very selective suppression pulses for MR spectroscopic imaging at 3T.

Authors:  Joseph A Osorio; Duan Xu; Charles H Cunningham; Albert Chen; Adam B Kerr; John M Pauly; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.