Wei Bian1, Yan Li2, Jason C Crane2, Sarah J Nelson2. 1. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA. 2. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To implement a fully automated atlas-based method for prescribing 3D PRESS MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI). METHODS: The PRESS selected volume and outer-volume suppression bands were predefined on the MNI152 standard template image. The template image was aligned to the subject T1 -weighted image during a scan, and the resulting transformation was then applied to the predefined prescription. To evaluate the method, H-1 MRSI data were obtained in repeat scan sessions from 20 healthy volunteers. In each session, datasets were acquired twice without repositioning. The overlap ratio of the prescribed volume in the two sessions was calculated and the reproducibility of inter- and intrasession metabolite peak height and area ratios was measured by the coefficient of variation (CoV). The CoVs from intra- and intersession were compared by a paired t-test. RESULTS: The average overlap ratio of the automatically prescribed selection volumes between two sessions was 97.8%. The average voxel-based intersession CoVs were less than 0.124 and 0.163 for peak height and area ratios, respectively. Paired t-test showed no significant difference between the intra- and intersession CoVs. CONCLUSION: The proposed method provides a time efficient method to prescribe 3D PRESS MRSI with reproducible imaging positioning and metabolite measurements. Magn Reson Med 79:636-642, 2018.
PURPOSE: To implement a fully automated atlas-based method for prescribing 3D PRESS MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI). METHODS: The PRESS selected volume and outer-volume suppression bands were predefined on the MNI152 standard template image. The template image was aligned to the subject T1 -weighted image during a scan, and the resulting transformation was then applied to the predefined prescription. To evaluate the method, H-1 MRSI data were obtained in repeat scan sessions from 20 healthy volunteers. In each session, datasets were acquired twice without repositioning. The overlap ratio of the prescribed volume in the two sessions was calculated and the reproducibility of inter- and intrasession metabolite peak height and area ratios was measured by the coefficient of variation (CoV). The CoVs from intra- and intersession were compared by a paired t-test. RESULTS: The average overlap ratio of the automatically prescribed selection volumes between two sessions was 97.8%. The average voxel-based intersession CoVs were less than 0.124 and 0.163 for peak height and area ratios, respectively. Paired t-test showed no significant difference between the intra- and intersession CoVs. CONCLUSION: The proposed method provides a time efficient method to prescribe 3D PRESS MRSI with reproducible imaging positioning and metabolite measurements. Magn Reson Med 79:636-642, 2018.
Authors: Günther Grabner; Andrew L Janke; Marc M Budge; David Smith; Jens Pruessner; D Louis Collins Journal: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Date: 2006
Authors: Deanna L Langer; Peter Rakaric; Anna Kirilova; David A Jaffray; Andrei Z Damyanovich Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Catherine M L Foy; Eileen M Daly; Amanda Glover; Ruth O'Gorman; Andrew Simmons; Declan G M Murphy; Simon Lovestone Journal: Brain Topogr Date: 2011-02-05 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: G Tedeschi; A Bertolino; G Campbell; A S Barnett; J H Duyn; P K Jacob; C T Moonen; J R Alger; G Di Chiro Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1996 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jeroen J G Geurts; Ilona E W Reuling; Hugo Vrenken; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Chris H Polman; Jonas A Castelijns; Frederik Barkhof; Petra J W Pouwels Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Young Woo Park; Dinesh K Deelchand; James M Joers; Brian Hanna; Adam Berrington; Joseph S Gillen; Kejal Kantarci; Brian J Soher; Peter B Barker; HyunWook Park; Gülin Öz; Christophe Lenglet Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Patrick J Bolan; Francesca Branzoli; Anna Luisa Di Stefano; Lucia Nichelli; Romain Valabregue; Sara L Saunders; Mehmet Akçakaya; Marc Sanson; Stéphane Lehéricy; Małgorzata Marjańska Journal: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Date: 2020-09-29
Authors: Adam W Autry; Jeremy W Gordon; Hsin-Yu Chen; Marisa LaFontaine; Robert Bok; Mark Van Criekinge; James B Slater; Lucas Carvajal; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Susan M Chang; Jennifer L Clarke; Janine M Lupo; Duan Xu; Peder E Z Larson; Daniel B Vigneron; Yan Li Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Philipp Moser; Korbinian Eckstein; Lukas Hingerl; Michael Weber; Stanislav Motyka; Bernhard Strasser; Andre van der Kouwe; Simon Robinson; Siegfried Trattnig; Wolfgang Bogner Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Yan Li; Wei Bian; Peder Larson; Jason C Crane; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Srikantan Nagarajan; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 3.169