BACKGROUND: Research on root cause analysis (RCA), a pivotal component of many patient safety improvement programmes, is limited. OBJECTIVE: To study a cohort of health professionals who conducted RCAs after completing the NSW Safety Improvement Program (SIP). HYPOTHESIS: Participants in RCAs would: (1) differ in demographic profile from non-participants, (2) encounter problems conducting RCAs as a result of insufficient system support, (3) encounter more problems if they had conducted fewer RCAs and (4) have positive attitudes regarding RCA and safety. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Anonymous questionnaire survey of 252 health professionals, drawn from a larger sample, who attended 2-day SIP courses across New South Wales, Australia. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic variables, experiences conducting RCAs, attitudes and safety skills acquired. RESULTS: No demographic variables differentiated RCA participants from non-participants. The difficulties experienced while conducting RCAs were lack of time (75.0%), resources (45.0%) and feedback (38.3%), and difficulties with colleagues (44.5%), RCA teams (34.2%), other professions (26.9%) and management (16.7%). Respondents reported benefits from RCAs, including improved patient safety (87.9%) and communication about patient care (79.8%). SIP courses had given participants skills to conduct RCAs (92.8%) and improve their safety practices (79.6%). Benefits from the SIP were thought to justify the investment by New South Wales Health (74.6%) and committing staff resources (72.6%). Most (84.8%) of the participants wanted additional RCA training. CONCLUSIONS: RCA participants reported improved skills and commitment to safety, but greater support from the workplace and health system are necessary to maintain momentum.
BACKGROUND: Research on root cause analysis (RCA), a pivotal component of many patient safety improvement programmes, is limited. OBJECTIVE: To study a cohort of health professionals who conducted RCAs after completing the NSW Safety Improvement Program (SIP). HYPOTHESIS: Participants in RCAs would: (1) differ in demographic profile from non-participants, (2) encounter problems conducting RCAs as a result of insufficient system support, (3) encounter more problems if they had conducted fewer RCAs and (4) have positive attitudes regarding RCA and safety. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Anonymous questionnaire survey of 252 health professionals, drawn from a larger sample, who attended 2-day SIP courses across New South Wales, Australia. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic variables, experiences conducting RCAs, attitudes and safety skills acquired. RESULTS: No demographic variables differentiated RCA participants from non-participants. The difficulties experienced while conducting RCAs were lack of time (75.0%), resources (45.0%) and feedback (38.3%), and difficulties with colleagues (44.5%), RCA teams (34.2%), other professions (26.9%) and management (16.7%). Respondents reported benefits from RCAs, including improved patient safety (87.9%) and communication about patient care (79.8%). SIP courses had given participants skills to conduct RCAs (92.8%) and improve their safety practices (79.6%). Benefits from the SIP were thought to justify the investment by New South Wales Health (74.6%) and committing staff resources (72.6%). Most (84.8%) of the participants wanted additional RCA training. CONCLUSIONS: RCA participants reported improved skills and commitment to safety, but greater support from the workplace and health system are necessary to maintain momentum.
Authors: James A Taylor; Dena Brownstein; Dimitri A Christakis; Susan Blackburn; Thomas P Strandjord; Eileen J Klein; Jaleh Shafii Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Natasha J Verbakel; Antoinette A de Bont; Theo J M Verheij; Cordula Wagner; Dorien L M Zwart Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: A Zachary Hettinger; Rollin J Fairbanks; Sudeep Hegde; Alexandra S Rackoff; John Wreathall; Vicki L Lewis; Ann M Bisantz; Robert L Wears Journal: J Healthc Risk Manag Date: 2013
Authors: Peter C Wierenga; Loraine Lie-A-Huen; Sophia E de Rooij; Niek S Klazinga; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Susanne M Smorenburg Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2009 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Maria Lucia Specchia; Giuseppe La Torre; Roberta Siliquini; Silvio Capizzi; Luca Valerio; Pierangela Nardella; Alessandro Campana; Walter Ricciardi Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-06-21 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Andrea Smeraglio; Matthew DiVeronica; Christopher Terndrup; Jacob Luty; Garrett Waagmeester; Shona Hunsaker Journal: MedEdPORTAL Date: 2021-06-21