Literature DB >> 11593886

Developing and deploying a patient safety program in a large health care delivery system: you can't fix what you don't know about.

J P Bagian1, C Lee, J Gosbee, J DeRosier, E Stalhandske, N Eldridge, R Williams, M Burkhardt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Administration (VA) identified patient safety as a high-priority issue in 1997 and implemented the Patient Safety Improvement (PSI) initiative throughout its entire health care system. In spring 1998 the External Panel on Patient Safety System Design recommended alternative methods to enhance reporting and thereby improve patient safety. REDESIGNING THE PSI INITIATIVE: The VA began redesigning the PSI initiative in late 1998. The dedicated National Center for Patient Safety (NCPS) was established. Using the panel's recommendations as a jumping-off point, NCPS began to identify known and suspected obstacles to implementation (such as possible punitive consequences and additional workload). NCPS adopted a prioritization scoring method, the Safety Assessment Code (SAC) Matrix, for close calls and adverse events, which requires assessing the event's actual or potential severity and the probability of occurrence. The SAC Matrix specifies actions that must be taken for given scores. Use of the SAC score permits a consistent handling of reports throughout the VA system and a rational selection of cases to be considered. A system for performing a root cause analysis (RCA) was developed to guide caregivers at the frontline. This system includes a computer-aided tool, a flipbook containing a series of six questions, and reporting of the findings back to the reporter. The final step requires that the facility's chief executive officer "concur" or "nonconcur" on each recommended corrective action. The RCA team outlines how the effectiveness of the corrective action will be evaluated to verify that the action has had the intended effect, and it ascertains that there were no unintended negative consequences. IMPLEMENTATION: Based on successful implementation in two pilots, full-scale national rollout to the 173 facilities began in April 2000 and was concluded by the end of August 2000. NCPS supplied 3 days of training for individuals at each facility. The training included didactic components, an introduction to human factors engineering concepts, and small- and large-group simulation exercises. Facility leaders were reminded of the necessity to reinforce the point that assignment to an RCA team was considered an important duty. DISCUSSION: It is essential to design and implement a system that takes into account the concerns of the frontline personnel and is aimed at being a tool for learning and not accountability. The system must have as its primary focus the dissemination of positive actions that reduce or eliminate vulnerabilities that have been identified, not a counting exercise of the number of reports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11593886     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27046-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  35 in total

1.  Setting priorities for patient safety.

Authors:  W B Runciman; M J Edmonds; M Pradhan
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-09

2.  Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations.

Authors:  V F Nieva; J Sorra
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

3.  Automated identification of extreme-risk events in clinical incident reports.

Authors:  Mei-Sing Ong; Farah Magrabi; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Beyond patient safety Flatland.

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Creating the web-based intensive care unit safety reporting system.

Authors:  Christine G Holzmueller; Peter J Pronovost; Fern Dickman; David A Thompson; Albert W Wu; Lisa H Lubomski; Maureen Fahey; Donald M Steinwachs; Lilly Engineer; Ali Jaffrey; Laura L Morlock; Todd Dorman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Development of the Leapfrog methodology for evaluating hospital implemented inpatient computerized physician order entry systems.

Authors:  P M Kilbridge; E M Welebob; D C Classen
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-04

7.  Evaluation of an intervention aimed at improving voluntary incident reporting in hospitals.

Authors:  Sue M Evans; Brian J Smith; Adrian Esterman; William B Runciman; Guy Maddern; Karen Stead; Pam Selim; Jane O'Shaughnessy; Sandy Muecke; Sue Jones
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-06

8.  Quality and safety in surgical care.

Authors:  Hiram C Polk; John Birkmeyer; David R Hunt; R Scott Jones; Anthony D Whittemore; Bruce Barraclough
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Temporal Trends in Mortality Rates among Kaiser Permanente Southern California Health Plan Enrollees, 2001-2016.

Authors:  Wansu Chen; Janis Yao; Zhi Liang; Fagen Xie; Don McCarthy; Lee Mingsum; Kristi Reynolds; Corinne Koebnick; Steven Jacobsen
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019

10.  Engaging patients and family members in patient safety--the experience of the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation.

Authors:  Joyce B Wale; Robert R Moon
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2005
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.