Literature DB >> 17136520

A reexamination of the size-weight illusion induced by visual size cues.

Satoru Kawai1, Frank Henigman, Christine L MacKenzie, Alex B Kuang, Paul H Faust.   

Abstract

The size-weight illusion induced by visually perceived sizes was reexamined to investigate whether this illusion is a sensory based or cognitive-based phenomenon. A computer-augmented environment was utilized to manipulate visual size information of target objects independently of their haptic information. Two physical cubes of equal mass (30.0 g) and size (3.0 x 3.0 x 3.0 cm) were suspended in parallel by wires attached to small graspable rings, in order to keep haptically obtained information constant between lifts. Instead of directly seeing each physical cube, subjects viewed 3D graphics of a cube with a wire and a ring that were precisely superimposed onto each physical cube. Seventeen subjects vertically lifted these augmented cubes, one after the other, by grasping the attached rings, and then reported their perception of cube heaviness. The graphical size of a comparison cube pseudo randomly varied for every comparison from 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.0 to 9.0 x 9.0 x 9.0 cm, while that of a standard cube remained constant (5.0 x 5.0 x 5.0 cm). Results indicated that the size-weight illusion frequently and systematically occurred for all the subjects such that when the comparison cube was relatively smaller than the standard cube, it was perceived to be heavier, and vice versa. As the size difference increased between the standard cube and the comparison cube, more subjects experienced the illusion, and vice versa. Follow-up tests showed occurrence of the size-weight illusion was significantly correlated with subject's sensitivity to discriminate weight, but not with sensitivity to discriminate visual size. Results suggest that the size-weight illusion induced by only visual size cues in an augmented environment is sensory based, and depends on an individual's integrated perception based on multimodal sensory information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17136520     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0803-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  43 in total

1.  Contribution of visually perceived size to the scaling of fingertip forces when lifting a 'small' object.

Authors:  S Kawai; C L MacKenzie; C J Ivens; T Yamamoto
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2000-12

2.  Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch.

Authors:  E L Amazeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Mathew S Grandy; David A Westwood
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Feeling with the mind's eye.

Authors:  K Sathian; A Zangaladze; J M Hoffman; S T Grafton
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-22       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Control of grasp stability when humans lift objects with different surface curvatures.

Authors:  P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Tangential torque effects on the control of grip forces when holding objects with a precision grip.

Authors:  H Kinoshita; L Bäckström; J R Flanagan; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Experimental demonstration of the sensory basis of the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  S C Masin; L Crestoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-10

9.  Factors influencing the force control during precision grip.

Authors:  G Westling; R S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Heaviness perception. II. Contributions of object weight, haptic size, and density to the accurate perception of heaviness or lightness.

Authors:  Satoru Kawai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

1.  Perception-action dissociation generalizes to the size-inertia illusion.

Authors:  Jonathan Platkiewicz; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The impetus theory in judgments about object motion: a new perspective.

Authors:  Peter A White
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

3.  Diminished size-weight illusion in anorexia nervosa: evidence for visuo-proprioceptive integration deficit.

Authors:  Laura K Case; Rachel C Wilson; Vilayanur S Ramachandran
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Superior size-weight illusion performance in patients with schizophrenia: evidence for deficits in forward models.

Authors:  Lisa E Williams; Vilayanur S Ramachandran; Edward M Hubbard; David L Braff; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  The integration of size and weight cues for perception and action: evidence for a weight-size illusion.

Authors:  Sarah Hirsiger; Kristen Pickett; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The Size-Weight Illusion is not anti-Bayesian after all: a unifying Bayesian account.

Authors:  Megan A K Peters; Wei Ji Ma; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  How Heavy Is an Illusory Length?

Authors:  Anouk J de Brouwer; Jeroen B J Smeets; Myrthe A Plaisier
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-09-21

8.  The size-weight illusion is unimpaired in individuals with a history of congenital visual deprivation.

Authors:  Rashi Pant; Maria J S Guerreiro; Pia Ley; Davide Bottari; Idris Shareef; Ramesh Kekunnaya; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Size, weight, and expectations.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Kim Vos; Emma Abbink; Myrthe Plaisier
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 1.695

10.  A weighty matter: heaviness influences the evaluation of disease severity, drug effectiveness, and side effects.

Authors:  Kai Kaspar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.