Literature DB >> 17135470

Online maintenance of sensory and motor representations: effects on corticospinal excitability.

Paul van den Hurk1, Rogier B Mars, Gijs van Elswijk, Judith Hegeman, Jaco W Pasman, Bastiaan R Bloem, Ivan Toni.   

Abstract

Flexible behavior requires the ability to delay a response until it is appropriate. This can be achieved by holding either a sensory or a motor representation online. Here we assess whether maintenance of sensory or motor material drives the motor system to different functional states, as indexed by alterations of corticospinal excitability. We used single-pulse TMS to measure corticospinal excitability evoked during the delay period of a novel paradigm in which task contingencies, rather than explicit verbal instructions, induced participants to use either sensory or motor codes to solve a delay-nonmatch-to-sample (DNMS) task. This approach allowed us to probe the state of the motor system while the participants were retaining either sensory or motor codes to cross the delay period, rather than the control of short-term storage driven by verbal instructions. When participants could prepare the movement in advance (preparation trials), the excitability of the motor cortex contralateral to the moving hand increased, whereas the excitability of the ipsilateral motor cortex decreased. The increase in excitability was confined to the prime mover, whereas the decrease in excitability extended to cortical territories controlling muscles unrelated to the response. Crucially, these changes in excitability were evoked only during preparation trials and not during trials in which subjects needed to maintain sensory items online (memory trials). We infer that short-term storage of sensory information and preparation of motor responses have differential and specific access to the output stage of the motor system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17135470     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01005.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Reduced intracortical inhibition during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task.

Authors:  Craig Sinclair; Geoffrey R Hammond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Excitatory and inhibitory processes in primary motor cortex during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task are unrelated to response expectancy.

Authors:  Craig Sinclair; Geoffrey R Hammond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Inhibition during response preparation is sensitive to response complexity.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Dylan Saks; Timothy Hoang; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Influence of Delay Period Duration on Inhibitory Processes for Response Preparation.

Authors:  Florent Lebon; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Benjamin Vanderschelden; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Interaction of temporal and ordinal representations in movement sequences.

Authors:  Katja Kornysheva; Anika Sierk; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Evidence for two concurrent inhibitory mechanisms during response preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; David Lew; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Etienne Olivier; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Modulation of short intra-cortical inhibition during action reprogramming.

Authors:  Franz-Xaver Neubert; Rogier B Mars; Etienne Olivier; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of motor preparation and spatial attention on corticospinal excitability in a delayed-response paradigm.

Authors:  Rogier B Mars; Sven Bestmann; John C Rothwell; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Changes in corticospinal excitability and the direction of evoked movements during motor preparation: a TMS study.

Authors:  Gijs van Elswijk; Willemijn D Schot; Dick F Stegeman; Sebastiaan Overeem
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.