Literature DB >> 17132378

Preferences for self-care or professional advice for minor illness: a discrete choice experiment.

Terry Porteous1, Mandy Ryan, Christine M Bond, Phil Hannaford.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the relative importance of factors that influence decision making in the management of minor illness, and how people trade between these factors. DESIGN OF STUDY: Discrete choice experiment.
SETTING: Scottish electoral roll.
METHOD: Six hundred and fifty-two responders of a previous national survey were invited to complete a discrete choice experiment questionnaire. This was used to measure relative preferences for managing symptoms of minor illness often associated with analgesic use. Three attributes were identified as important to participants: type of management, availability, and cost of managing symptoms. Trade-offs between these attributes were examined.
RESULTS: A 57% response rate was achieved (51% valid response rate). People preferred to manage symptoms by self-care and were willing to pay almost pounds 23 to do so. Community pharmacy was the preferred source of advice. Responders preferred less waiting time and paying less money when managing symptoms, and were willing to trade between factors. A less preferred type of management became more attractive when waiting times and cost were reduced.
CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that self-care is the preferred method of managing symptoms of minor illness. When developing services to support self-care, policy makers should invest in services that reduce waiting times and incur least cost to users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17132378      PMCID: PMC1934050     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  9 in total

1.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.

Authors:  M Ryan; S Farrar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

2.  Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  M Ryan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  'Irrational' stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Fernando San Miguel; Mandy Ryan; Mabelle Amaya-Amaya
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan; Karen Gerard
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.561

5.  How and why are non-prescription analgesics used in Scotland?

Authors:  Terry Porteous; Christine Bond; Philip Hannaford; Hazel Sinclair
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Women's experiences of and preferences for services after rape in South Africa: interview study.

Authors:  N J Christofides; D Muirhead; R K Jewkes; L Penn-Kekana; D N Conco
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-05

Review 7.  Self-management interventions for chronic illness.

Authors:  Stanton Newman; Liz Steed; Kathleen Mulligan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Oct 23-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Why do people consult the doctor?

Authors:  S M Campbell; M O Roland
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Mark Sculpher; Stirling Bryan; Pat Fry; Patricia de Winter; Heather Payne; Mark Emberton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-29
  9 in total
  35 in total

Review 1.  Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Ewan Gray; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-06

2.  Self-care--has DIY gone too far?

Authors:  Angela Ryan; Sheila Greenfield; Richard McManus; Sue Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma?: a comparison of two discrete-choice experiments.

Authors:  Brigitte A B Essers; Debby van Helvoort-Postulart; Martin H Prins; Martino Neumann; Carmen D Dirksen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Physician office vs retail clinic: patient preferences in care seeking for minor illnesses.

Authors:  Arif Ahmed; Jack E Fincham
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Evaluation of a Community-Run and General-Practitioner-Supervised Self-Care for Minor Illnesses (CGPSC) Program in a Remote Area in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yun-Ke Chiu; Ying-Wei Wang; Jih-I Yeh; Yi-Chun Sun
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-04

6.  Pharmacy users' expectations of pharmacy encounters: a Q-methodological study.

Authors:  Tobias Renberg; Kristina Wichman Törnqvist; Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong; Asa Kettis Lindblad; Mary P Tully
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Assessment of pharmacist's recommendation of non-prescription medicines in Brazil: a simulated patient study.

Authors:  Alessandra Rezende Mesquita; Dalmare Anderson Bezerra de Oliveira Sá; Ana Patrícia Alves Lima Santos; Abilio de Almeida Neto; Divaldo Pereira Lyra
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-06-06

8.  Valuing benefits to inform a clinical trial in pharmacy : do differences in utility measures at baseline affect the effectiveness of the intervention?

Authors:  Michela Tinelli; Mandy Ryan; Christine Bond; Anthony Scott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Are patients willing to pay for total shoulder arthroplasty? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Nathan N O'Hara; Gerard P Slobogean; Tima Mohammadi; Carlo A Marra; Milena R Vicente; Amir Khakban; Michael D McKee
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Dr. Me project: Teaching children self-care for self-limiting illnesses in primary schools.

Authors:  Chee Yeen Fung
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2020-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.