Literature DB >> 1712960

A comparison of QRS complexes resulting from unipolar and bipolar pacing: implications for pace-mapping.

A H Kadish1, S Schmaltz, F Morady.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To examine differences in QRS configuration produced by bipolar versus unipolar pacing, 12-lead electrocardiograms recorded during bipolar (distal cathode) pacing with 5- and 10-mm interelectrode distances were compared to electrocardiograms recorded during unipolar cathodal pacing from the distal catheter pole. Pacing was performed at a cycle length of 500 msec using each of the two bipolar configurations at current strengths equal to late diastolic threshold, twice threshold and 10 mA. The pacing site was at the right ventricular apex in 15 patients and at various left ventricular locations in 14 patients. The electrocardiograms recorded during bipolar and unipolar pacing were compared by two independent observers for minor QRS configuration changes, major configuration changes and amplitude changes. Minor configuration differences between unipolar and bipolar pacing occurred occasionally when the interelectrode distance during bipolar pacing was 5 mm (mean +/- S.D. 0.5 +/- 1.2 leads per electrocardiogram). However, when the interelectrode distance was 10 mm, minor configuration differences were seen more commonly (1.3 +/- 2.0 leads per electrocardiogram; P less than 0.05 vs 5-mm distance). Major configuration differences were uncommon with either configuration at all current strengths. Pacing at 10 mA produced a larger number of configuration differences than pacing at either threshold or twice threshold (P less than 0.05). Amplitude differences were seen in a mean of 1.9 +/- 2.1 leads per electrocardiogram with the 5-mm interelectrode distance and a mean of 2.9 +/- 2.1 leads using the 10-mm interelectrode distance (P less than 0.05). IN
CONCLUSION: (1) bipolar ventricular pacing can result in QRS complexes that are different from those obtained with unipolar pacing at the same catheter location, presumably due to an anodal contribution during bipolar pacing; (2) increasing the interelectrode distance and stimulus intensity increases these differences; and (3) because the proximal electrode's contribution to depolarization can alter the QRS configuration during pacing in a variable way, the use of bipolar pace-mapping to localize sites of origin of ventricular tachycardia may result in less spatial resolution than unipolar pace-mapping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1712960     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb04113.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

1.  Pace mapping in the atrium using bipolar electrograms from widely spaced electrodes.

Authors:  Raja J Selvaraj; Sreekanth Yerram; Pradeep Kumar; Santhosh Satheesh; Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai; Mahesh Kumar Saktheeswaran; Jayaraman Balachander
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-03-20

2.  Pacing polarity and left ventricular mechanical activation sequence in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Hyan Suk Yang; Giuseppe Caracciolo; Partho P Sengupta; Ramil Goel; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Komandoor Srivathsan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Pacemapping.

Authors:  Mauricio Moreno; Nicasio Perez-Castellano; Julian Villacastin
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2005-01-01

Review 6.  The Physiologic Mechanisms of Paced QRS Narrowing During Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Right Bundle Branch Block Patients.

Authors:  Kailun Zhu; Yali Sun; Manxin Lin; Yingjian Deng; Linlin Li; Guiyang Li; Jianghai Liu; Xingcai Wan; Dong Chang; Qiang Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.