Literature DB >> 17119961

Early mechanical failure in total knee arthroplasty.

Marc-Antoine Rousseau1, Jean-Yves Lazennec, Yves Catonné.   

Abstract

Early mechanical dysfunction of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging problem in terms of causality and solutions. The current strategy in our department is to perform a complete TKA revision rather than the less invasive partial procedures when a clear mechanical cause of failure has been found. In this investigation, we assessed 21 patients who underwent complete TKA revision in 2003-2004 in our institution within the first two years following the index TKA. Various clinical presentations included pain, stiffness, instability, and femoro-patellar signs. These corresponded to implant size, position, and fixation issues. The IKS knee score/function significantly increased from 47/47 to 85/78 at follow-up (six months minimum). Compared to the data in the literature, this systematic full revision seems to be a reasonable approach. This attitude takes advantage of the modularity of the implants for allowing perioperative adjustments of position, fixation, and constraint. Based on the results of our study, we propose a list of six mechanical pitfalls to be evaluated in the case of early dysfunction: frontal misalignment, sagittal overstuffing or malpositioning, axial malrotation, poor bone fixation, inappropriate constraint or ligamentous balance, and inappropriate level of the joint space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17119961      PMCID: PMC2219938          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0276-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  17 in total

1.  Early failures in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T K Fehring; S Odum; W L Griffin; J B Mason; M Nadaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Knee stiffness on extension caused by an oversized femoral component after total knee arthroplasty: a report of two cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Chun-Sheng Lo; Shyu-Jye Wang; Shing-Sheng Wu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Isolated revision of the patellar component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold; Craig D Silverton; Regina M Barden; Aaron G Rosenberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Strategies of stem fixation and the role of supplemental bone graft in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Charles L Nelson; Jess H Lonner; James A Rand; Paul A Lotke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Outcome comparison of partial and full component revision TKA.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Susan Odum; William L Griffin; J Bohannon Mason
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The results of revision knee arthroplasty with and without retention of secure cemented femoral components.

Authors:  D C Mackay; M S Siddique
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-05

7.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?

Authors:  Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack; Richard H Rothman; Shani Shastri; Sidney M Jacoby
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Survival analysis of cemented Press-Fit Condylar total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  F M Khaw; L M Kirk; P J Gregg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Poor outcomes of isolated tibial insert exchange and arthrolysis for the management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G C Babis; R T Trousdale; M W Pagnano; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Survival analysis of a cementless, cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clinical and radiographic assessment 10 to 13 years after surgery.

Authors:  H Watanabe; S Akizuki; T Takizawa
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08
View more
  15 in total

1.  Immediate recovery room radiographs after primary total knee arthroplasty-why do we keep doing them?

Authors:  Yona Kosashvili; Mansour Alvi; Ian P Mayne; Oleg Safir; Alan Gross; David Backstein
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Does minimally invasive surgery improve short-term recovery in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Tao Liu; Guoyou Zhang; Xiaochun Peng; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Scorpio single radius total knee arthroplasty. A minimal five-year follow-up multicentric study.

Authors:  Frédéric Borrione; Paul Bonnevialle; Christian Mabit; Olivier Guingand; Denis Bertin; François Bonnomet; Christophe Denis; Gilles Gagna
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A meta-analysis of minimally invasive and conventional medial parapatella approaches for primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Canfeng Li; Yi Zeng; Bin Shen; Pengde Kang; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Morphometric evaluation of the knee in Chinese population reveals sexual dimorphism and age-related differences.

Authors:  Ke Li; Etienne Cavaignac; Wei Xu; Qiang Cheng; Nobert Telmon; Wei Huang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  The painful knee after TKA: a diagnostic algorithm for failure analysis.

Authors:  S Hofmann; G Seitlinger; O Djahani; M Pietsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Computerised tomography vs magnetic resonance imaging for modeling of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul Stirling; Rejith Valsalan Mannambeth; Agustin Soler; Vineet Batta; Rajeev Kumar Malhotra; Yegappan Kalairajah
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

8.  Resection arthroplasty for failed patellar components.

Authors:  Carlos J Lavernia; Jose C Alcerro; Michael K Drakeford; Audrey K Tsao; Kenneth A Krackow; David S Hungerford
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Polyethylene thickness is a risk factor for wear necessitating insert exchange.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Henrica M J Van der Linden-Van der Zwaag; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  No differences in in vivo kinematics between six different types of knee prostheses.

Authors:  N Wolterbeek; R G H H Nelissen; E R Valstar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.