Literature DB >> 9268075

Prediction of pathological tumor volume in clinically localized prostate cancer: value of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging.

R Lencioni1, I Menchi, A Paolicchi, M Carini, A Amorosi, C Bartolozzi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables accurate assessment of pathologic tumor volume in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Twenty-four patients with biopsy-proved prostate carcinoma underwent MRI at 0.5 T before radical prostatectomy. Tumor volumes were determined independently on axial fast-spin-echo (SE) T2-weighted MR images and whole-mount pathology slides of the surgical specimens. At pathology, tumor volumes ranged from 0.17 to 9.42 cm3 (mean +/- SD, 3.11 +/- 2.99 cm3). A strong correlation (r = .944) was found between measurements of tumor volume based on MR images and pathological specimens. The error was less than 0.5 cm3 in 14 cases, in the range of 0.5-1 cm3 in 7 cases, and more than 1 cm3 in 3 cases. By using an MR tumor volume of 2 cm3 as cutoff value, extracapsular tumor spread could be predicted with a sensitivity of 81.2%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 87.5%. Tumor volume determinations based on MR images seem to be accurate enough to be helpful in clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9268075     DOI: 10.1007/bf02592242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  28 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: correlation of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and prostate specific antigen levels with tumor volumes in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  M Palken; O E Cobb; B H Warren; D C Hoak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Inflatable surface coil for MR imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  J F Martin; P Hajek; L Baker; V Gylys-Morin; R Fitzmorris-Glass; R R Mattrey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  M L Schiebler; M D Schnall; H M Pollack; R E Lenkinski; J E Tomaszewski; A J Wein; R Whittington; W Rauschning; H Y Kressel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Pathogenesis and biological significance of seminal vesicle invasion in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  A A Villers; J E McNeal; E A Redwine; F S Freiha; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The role of radical prostatectomy in the management of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  P C Walsh; H Lepor
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images.

Authors:  E K Outwater; R O Petersen; E S Siegelman; L G Gomella; C E Chernesky; D G Mitchell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Evaluation of the prostate and prostatic carcinoma with gadolinium-enhanced endorectal coil MR imaging.

Authors:  S A Mirowitz; J J Brown; J P Heiken
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Capsular penetration in prostate cancer. Significance for natural history and treatment.

Authors:  J E McNeal; A A Villers; E A Redwine; F S Freiha; T A Stamey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  T A Stamey; F S Freiha; J E McNeal; E A Redwine; A S Whittemore; H P Schmid
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging.

Authors:  M D Schnall; Y Imai; J Tomaszewski; H M Pollack; R E Lenkinski; H Y Kressel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Endorectal coil MR imaging findings in hemospermia.

Authors:  R Lencioni; S Ortori; D Cioni; G Morelli; E Ceretti; M Cosottini; I Menchi; C Bartolozzi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 3.  Multi-parametric MRI imaging of the prostate-implications for focal therapy.

Authors:  James S Wysock; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  Use of Imaging to Optimise Prostate Cancer Tumour Volume Assessment for Focal Therapy Planning.

Authors:  David Eldred-Evans; Henry Tam; Andrew P T Smith; Mathias Winkler; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.092

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.