Literature DB >> 17114013

Postoperative pancreatic fistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy.

Wande Pratt1, Shishir K Maithel, Tsafrir Vanounou, Mark P Callery, Charles M Vollmer.   

Abstract

It is uncertain whether postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal and central pancreatectomies behave similarly to those after pancreaticoduodenectomy. To date, this concept has not been validated either clinically or economically. Overall, 256 consecutive pancreatic resections from October 2001 to February 2006 (184 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 66 distal pancreatectomies, and 6 central pancreatectomies) were evaluated according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula classification scheme. Pancreatic fistula was defined as any measurable drainage on or after postoperative day 3, with amylase content greater than three times the normal serum value. Outcomes were divided into four grades: (1) no fistula, (2) grade A: biochemical fistula without clinical sequelae, (3) grade B: fistula requiring any therapeutic intervention, or (4) grade C: fistula with severe clinical sequelae. Grades B and C are considered clinically relevant fistulas based on worsening morbidity, increased length of stay, frequent hospital readmission, and increased costs/resource utilization. Clinical and economic outcomes were compared-grade for grade-across the three resection types. Fistulas of any extent (Grades A-C) occurred in one third of all patients; two thirds had no fistula. Overall, there were 16 readmissions (6%), six reoperations (2%), and no deaths attributable to pancreatic fistula. Outcomes between no fistula and grade A patients were identical across resection types, though grade A fistula was more common in distal pancreatectomy. For each resection type, length of stay and costs progressively increased with grades B and C. However, the negative impact of these clinically relevant fistulas varied between resection types. Rates for intensive care unit admission and rehabilitation placement were higher among pancreaticoduodenectomy patients. Total parenteral nutrition and antibiotic use were similar, but percutaneous drainage was used more often for distal pancreatectomy. Grade B fistula was more severe after distal pancreatectomy, as indicated by increased length of stay, readmissions, and total cost. Although reoperation rates for grade C fistulas were equivalent, intervals to reoperation were substantially longer after distal and central pancreatectomies. When classified according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula criteria, clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas behaved differently depending on type of pancreatectomy. This translates into variable severity that guides management decisions, which ultimately dictate clinical outcomes and economic impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17114013     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  28 in total

1.  Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume centre: results on 150 consecutive patients.

Authors:  C Bassi; M Falconi; R Salvia; G Mascetta; E Molinari; P Pederzoli
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ronnie Tung Ping Poon; Siu Hung Lo; Daniel Fong; Sheung Tat Fan; John Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Central pancreatectomy for the resection of benign or low malignant potential neoplasms.

Authors:  John D Christein; Anthony W Kim; Mehra A Golshan; Justin Maxhimer; Daniel J Deziel; Richard A Prinz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Medial pancreatectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 53 patients by the French Pancreas Club.

Authors:  Alain Sauvanet; Christian Partensky; Bernard Sastre; Jean-François Gigot; Pierre-Louis Fagniez; Jean-Jacques Tuech; Bertrand Millat; Stéphane Berdah; Bertrand Dousset; Daniel Jaeck; Yves-Patrice Le Treut; Christian Letoublon
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

6.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Medial pancreatectomy for tumors of the neck of the pancreas.

Authors:  N Rotman; B Sastre; P L Fagniez
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Central pancreatectomy for benign pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Kimberly M Brown; Margo Shoup; Adam Abodeely; Pam Hodul; John J Brems; Gerard V Aranha
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Central (middle segment) pancreatectomy: a suitable operation for small lesions of the neck of the pancreas.

Authors:  Gerard V Aranha
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec
View more
  35 in total

1.  Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Daniel J Moskovic; Sally E Hodges; Meng-Fen Wu; F Charles Brunicardi; Susan G Hilsenbeck; William E Fisher
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  A grading system can predict clinical and economic outcomes of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 755 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Despoina Daskalaki; Giovanni Butturini; Enrico Molinari; Stefano Crippa; Paolo Pederzoli; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Roux-en-Y end-to-end and end-to-side double pancreaticojejunostomy: application of the reconstructive method of the Beger procedure to central pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Piero Chirletti; Nadia Peparini; Roberto Caronna; Gianfranco Fanello; Giovanna Delogu; Roberto Luca Meniconi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after deep enucleation of benign or borderline pancreatic lesions: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Zhiwen Xiao; Guopei Luo; Zuqiang Liu; Kaizhou Jin; Jin Xu; Chen Liu; Liang Liu; Quanxing Ni; Jiang Long; Xianjun Yu
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Externalized Stents for Pancreatoduodenectomy Provide Value Only in High-Risk Scenarios.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Brett L Ecker; Stephen W Behrman; Mark P Callery; John D Christein; Jeffrey A Drebin; Douglas L Fraker; Tara S Kent; Major K Lee; Robert E Roses; Michael H Sprys; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Assessment of health care cost for complex surgical patients: review of cost, re-imbursement and revenue involved in pancreatic surgery at a high-volume academic medical centre.

Authors:  Swapnil D Kachare; Kendall R Liner; Nasreen A Vohra; Emmanuel E Zervos; Todd Hickey; Timothy L Fitzgerald
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  How do we predict the clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?--an analysis in 244 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Seiko Hirono; Shinomi Ina; Motoki Miyazawa; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Roux-en-Y drainage of the pancreatic stump decreases pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatic resection.

Authors:  M Wagner; B Gloor; M Ambühl; M Worni; J A Lutz; E Angst; D Candinas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Middle segment pancreatectomy can be safely incorporated into a pancreatic surgeon's clinical practice.

Authors:  Harish Lavu; Jamie L Knuth; Marshall S Baker; Changyu Shen; Nicholas J Zyromski; Max Schmidt; Atilla Nakeeb; Thomas J Howard
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.