Literature DB >> 17100992

Predictive and pre-natal testing for Huntington Disease in Australia: results and challenges encountered during a 10-year period (1994-2003).

R J Tassicker1, P K Marshall, T A Liebeck, M A Keville, B M Singaram, F H Richards.   

Abstract

This study summarizes 10-years' experience of predictive and pre-natal testing and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for Huntington disease (HD) in Australia. Results are presented from 2036 direct mutation predictive tests conducted between January 1994 and December 2003. Thirty-eight per cent of results (776/2036) were positive, 56% (1140/2036) were negative, and 6% (120/2036)) were in the mutable normal (27-35 CAG repeats) or in the reduced penetrance (36-39 CAG repeats) ranges. Ninety-four per cent (1908/2036) and 6% (128/2036) of those tested had prior genetic risks of 50% and 25%, respectively. Twenty-seven per cent (34/128) of those at 25% risk had their genetic status changed to positive, thus revealing the positive status of their at-risk parent. During this period, 63 pre-natal tests were also conducted, and 13 children were born following PGD for HD. Social workers specializing in predictive testing counselling over this 10-year period across Australia identified and summarized particularly challenging counselling issues. These included the interpretation of mutable normal and reduced penetrance range test results, potential conflicts of interest between family members regarding testing decisions, unanticipated consequences of both predictive and pre-natal testing decisions, the importance of following protocols for predictive testing to facilitate long-term adjustment to results, and the potential for genetic discrimination. The identified issues highlight the importance of the protocols for predictive testing and indicate that extension of the international guidelines published in 1994 may be timely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17100992     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00701.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  10 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for Huntington's disease: the experience of three European centres.

Authors:  Maartje C Van Rij; Marjan De Rademaeker; Céline Moutou; Jos C F M Dreesen; Martine De Rycke; Inge Liebaers; Joep P M Geraedts; Christine E M De Die-Smulders; Stéphane Viville
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  A comparative analysis of ethical and professional challenges experienced by Australian and U.S. genetic counselors.

Authors:  Sarah Alliman; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Fengqin Lian; Carolyn James; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Factors related to genetic testing in adults at risk for Huntington disease: the prospective Huntington at-risk observational study (PHAROS).

Authors:  K A Quaid; S W Eberly; E Kayson-Rubin; D Oakes; I Shoulson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Huntington disease: who seeks presymptomatic genetic testing, why and what are the outcomes?

Authors:  Tracey M Scuffham; John C MacMillan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  "Grasping the grey": patient understanding and interpretation of an intermediate allele predictive test result for Huntington disease.

Authors:  A Semaka; L G Balneaves; M R Hayden
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Couples at risk for spinocerebellar ataxia type 2: the Cuban prenatal diagnosis experience.

Authors:  Tania Cruz-Mariño; Luis Velázquez-Pérez; Yanetza González-Zaldivar; Raúl Aguilera-Rodríguez; Miguel Velázquez-Santos; Yaimé Vázquez-Mojena; Annelié Estupiñán-Rodríguez; Rubén Reynaldo-Armiñán; Luis Enrique Almaguer-Mederos; José Miguel Laffita-Mesa; Victor Tamayo-Chiang; Milena Paneque
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-05-15

Review 7.  A review of quality of life after predictive testing for and earlier identification of neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Jane S Paulsen; Martha Nance; Ji-In Kim; Noelle E Carlozzi; Peter K Panegyres; Cheryl Erwin; Anita Goh; Elizabeth McCusker; Janet K Williams
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 11.685

8.  Reverse pre-symptomatic testing for Huntington disease: double disclosure when 25% at-risk children reveal the genetic status to their parent.

Authors:  Adeline Bonnard; Ariane Herson; Marcela Gargiulo; Alexandra Durr
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Ascertainment bias causes false signal of anticipation in genetic prion disease.

Authors:  Eric Vallabh Minikel; Inga Zerr; Steven J Collins; Claudia Ponto; Alison Boyd; Genevieve Klug; André Karch; Joanna Kenny; John Collinge; Leonel T Takada; Sven Forner; Jamie C Fong; Simon Mead; Michael D Geschwind
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Predictive testing for inherited prion disease: report of 22 years experience.

Authors:  Jane Owen; Jon Beck; Tracy Campbell; Gary Adamson; Michele Gorham; Andrew Thompson; Sarah Smithson; Elizabeth Rosser; Peter Rudge; John Collinge; Simon Mead
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.246

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.