AIMS: To develop a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis describing the changes in luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone concentrations following treatment with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist triptorelin and the GnRH receptor blocker degarelix. METHODS:Fifty-eight healthy subjects received single subcutaneous or intramuscular injections of 3.75 mg of triptorelinand 170 prostate cancer patients receivedmultiple subcutaneous doses of degarelix of between 120 and 320 mg. All subjects were pooled for the population PK/PD data analysis. A systematic population PK/PD model-building framework using stochastic differential equations was applied to the data to identify nonlinear dynamic dependencies and to deconvolve the functional feedback interactions of the HPG axis. RESULTS: In our final PK/PD model of the HPG axis, the half-life of LH was estimated to be 1.3 h and that of testosterone 7.69 h, which corresponds well with literature values. The estimated potency of LH with respect to testosterone secretion was 5.18 IU l(-1), with a maximal stimulation of 77.5 times basal testosterone production. The estimated maximal triptorelin stimulation of the basal LH pool release was 1330 times above basal concentrations, with a potency of 0.047 ng ml(-1). The LH pool release was decreased by a maximum of 94.2% by degarelix with an estimated potency of 1.49 ng ml(-1). CONCLUSIONS: Our model of the HPG axis was able to account for the different dynamic responses observed after administration of both GnRH agonists and GnRH receptor blockers, suggesting that the model adequately characterizes the underlying physiology of the endocrine system.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To develop a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis describing the changes in luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone concentrations following treatment with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist triptorelin and the GnRH receptor blocker degarelix. METHODS: Fifty-eight healthy subjects received single subcutaneous or intramuscular injections of 3.75 mg of triptorelin and 170 prostate cancerpatients received multiple subcutaneous doses of degarelix of between 120 and 320 mg. All subjects were pooled for the population PK/PD data analysis. A systematic population PK/PD model-building framework using stochastic differential equations was applied to the data to identify nonlinear dynamic dependencies and to deconvolve the functional feedback interactions of the HPG axis. RESULTS: In our final PK/PD model of the HPG axis, the half-life of LH was estimated to be 1.3 h and that of testosterone 7.69 h, which corresponds well with literature values. The estimated potency of LH with respect to testosterone secretion was 5.18 IU l(-1), with a maximal stimulation of 77.5 times basal testosterone production. The estimated maximal triptorelin stimulation of the basal LH pool release was 1330 times above basal concentrations, with a potency of 0.047 ng ml(-1). The LH pool release was decreased by a maximum of 94.2% by degarelix with an estimated potency of 1.49 ng ml(-1). CONCLUSIONS: Our model of the HPG axis was able to account for the different dynamic responses observed after administration of both GnRH agonists and GnRH receptor blockers, suggesting that the model adequately characterizes the underlying physiology of the endocrine system.
Authors: G Jiang; J Stalewski; R Galyean; J Dykert; C Schteingart; P Broqua; A Aebi; M L Aubert; G Semple; P Robson; K Akinsanya; R Haigh; P Riviere; J Trojnar; J L Junien; J E Rivier Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2001-02-01 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: G de Pinieux; M E Legrier; F Poirson-Bichat; Y Courty; R Bras-Gonçalves; A M Dutrillaux; F Némati; S Oudard; R Lidereau; P Broqua; J L Junien; B Dutrillaux; M F Poupon Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Pravin R Jadhav; Henrik Agersø; Christoffer W Tornøe; Jogarao V S Gobburu Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Eija A Lundström; Rupert K Rencken; Johann H van Wyk; Lance J E Coetzee; Johann C M Bahlmann; Simon Reif; Erdam A Strasheim; Martin C Bigalke; Alan R Pontin; Louis Goedhals; Douw G Steyn; Chris F Heyns; Luigi A Aldera; Thomas M Mackenzie; Daniela Purcea; Pierre Y Grosgurin; Hervé C Porchet Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Núria Buil-Bruna; María Jesús Garrido; Marion Dehez; Amandine Manon; Thi Xuan Quyen Nguyen; Edda L Gomez-Panzani; Iñaki F Trocóniz Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Marieke Liem-Moolenaar; Pierre Peeters; Ingrid M C Kamerling; Chris Hogg; Graham Holder; Huub Jan Kleijn; Edwin Spaans; Joanna Udo De Haes; Marieke L de Kam; Kari L Franson; Adam F Cohen; Joop M A van Gerven Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Steve Choy; Emilie Hénin; Jan-Stefan van der Walt; Maria C Kjellsson; Mats O Karlsson Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2012-11-24 Impact factor: 2.745