Literature DB >> 17094074

Relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in cluster randomized and multicentre trials.

Gerard J P van Breukelen1, Math J J M Candel, Martijn P F Berger.   

Abstract

Cluster randomized and multicentre trials evaluate the effect of a treatment on persons nested within clusters, for instance, patients within clinics or pupils within schools. Optimal sample sizes at the cluster (centre) and person level have been derived under the restrictive assumption of equal sample sizes per cluster. This paper addresses the relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in case of cluster randomization and person randomization within clusters. Starting from maximum likelihood parameter estimation, the relative efficiency is investigated numerically for a range of cluster size distributions. An approximate formula is presented for computing the relative efficiency as a function of the mean and variance of cluster size and the intraclass correlation, which can be used for adjusting the sample size. The accuracy of this formula is checked against the numerical results and found to be quite good. It is concluded that the loss of efficiency due to variation of cluster sizes rarely exceeds 10 per cent and can be compensated by sampling 11 per cent more clusters. (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17094074     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  36 in total

Review 1.  Multilevel factorial experiments for developing behavioral interventions: power, sample size, and resource considerations.

Authors:  John J Dziak; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Linda M Collins
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-02-06

2.  Sample Size Calculation for Count Outcomes in Cluster Randomization Trials with Varying Cluster Sizes.

Authors:  Jijia Wang; Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 0.893

Review 3.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Sample size estimation for stratified individual and cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Lee Kennedy-Shaffer; Michael D Hughes
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Peng Li; David T Redden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A comparison of statistical approaches for physician-randomized trials with survival outcomes.

Authors:  Margaret R Stedman; Robert A Lew; Elena Losina; David R Gagnon; Daniel H Solomon; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Booklet for Childhood Fever in Out-of-Hours Primary Care: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Eefje G P M de Bont; Geert-Jan Dinant; Gijs Elshout; Gijs van Well; Nick A Francis; Bjorn Winkens; Jochen W L Cals
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Sample size calculation in hierarchical 2 × 2 factorial trials with unequal cluster sizes.

Authors:  Zizhong Tian; Denise Esserman; Guangyu Tong; Ondrej Blaha; James Dziura; Peter Peduzzi; Fan Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Sample size considerations for GEE analyses of three-level cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Steven Teerenstra; Bing Lu; John S Preisser; Theo van Achterberg; George F Borm
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Relative efficiency of equal versus unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.

Authors:  Jingxia Liu; Chengjie Xiong; Lei Liu; Guoqiao Wang; Luo Jingqin; Feng Gao; Ling Chen; Yan Li
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 1.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.