Literature DB >> 17093999

Computational analysis of CFSE proliferation assay.

Tatyana Luzyanina1, Sonja Mrusek, John T Edwards, Dirk Roose, Stephan Ehl, Gennady Bocharov.   

Abstract

CFSE based tracking of the lymphocyte proliferation using flow cytometry is a powerful experimental technique in immunology allowing for the tracing of labelled cell populations over time in terms of the number of divisions cells undergone. Interpretation and understanding of such population data can be greatly improved through the use of mathematical modelling. We apply a heterogenous linear compartmental model, described by a system of ordinary differential equations similar to those proposed by Kendall. This model allows division number-dependent rates of cell proliferation and death and describes the rate of changes in the numbers of cells having undergone j divisions. The experimental data set that we specifically analyze specifies the following characteristics of the kinetics of PHA-induced human T lymphocyte proliferation assay in vitro: (1) the total number of live cells, (2) the total number of dead but not disintegrated cells and (3) the number of cells divided j times. Following the maximum likelihood approach for data fitting, we estimate the model parameters which, in particular, present the CTL birth- and death rate "functions". It is the first study of CFSE labelling data which convincingly shows that the lymphocyte proliferation and death both in vitro and in vivo are division number dependent. For the first time, the confidence in the estimated parameter values is analyzed by comparing three major methods: the technique based on the variance-covariance matrix, the profile-likelihood-based approach and the bootstrap technique. We compare results and performance of these methods with respect to their robustness and computational cost. We show that for evaluating mathematical models of differing complexity the information-theoretic approach, based upon indicators measuring the information loss for a particular model (Kullback-Leibler information), provides a consistent basis. We specifically discuss methodological and computational difficulties in parameter identification with CFSE data, e.g. the loss of confidence in the parameter estimates starting around the sixth division. Overall, our study suggests that the heterogeneity inherent in cell kinetics should be explicitly incorporated into the structure of mathematical models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17093999     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-006-0046-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  11 in total

1.  Dynamics and requirements of T cell clonal expansion in vivo at the single-cell level: effector function is linked to proliferative capacity.

Authors:  H Gudmundsdottir; A D Wells; L A Turka
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Cutting edge: naive T cells masquerading as memory cells.

Authors:  K Murali-Krishna; R Ahmed
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Counting probability distributions: differential geometry and model selection.

Authors:  I J Myung; V Balasubramanian; M A Pitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A cellular calculus for signal integration by T cells.

Authors:  A V Gett; P D Hodgkin
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 25.606

5.  Quantifying cell turnover using CFSE data.

Authors:  Vitaly V Ganusov; Sergei S Pilyugin; Rob J de Boer; Kaja Murali-Krishna; Rafi Ahmed; Rustom Antia
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Do cells cycle?

Authors:  J A Smith; L Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Following the fate of individual T cells throughout activation and clonal expansion. Signals from T cell receptor and CD28 differentially regulate the induction and duration of a proliferative response.

Authors:  A D Wells; H Gudmundsdottir; L A Turka
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Analysis of cell kinetics using a cell division marker: mathematical modeling of experimental data.

Authors:  Samuel Bernard; Laurent Pujo-Menjouet; Michael C Mackey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  The rescaling method for quantifying the turnover of cell populations.

Authors:  Sergei S Pilyugin; Vitaly V Ganusov; Kaja Murali-Krishna; Rafi Ahmed; Rustom Antia
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Automated flow cytometry for acquisition of time-dependent population data.

Authors:  Nicholas R Abu-Absi; Abdelqader Zamamiri; James Kacmar; Steven J Balogh; Friedrich Srienc
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.355

View more
  13 in total

1.  Label Structured Cell Proliferation Models.

Authors:  H T Banks; Frédérique Charles; Marie Doumic Jauffret; Karyn L Sutton; W Clayton Thompson
Journal:  Appl Math Lett       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.055

2.  Distributed parameter identification for a label-structured cell population dynamics model using CFSE histogram time-series data.

Authors:  Tatyana Luzyanina; Dirk Roose; Gennady Bocharov
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Mathematical models for CFSE labelled lymphocyte dynamics: asymmetry and time-lag in division.

Authors:  Tatyana Luzyanina; Jovana Cupovic; Burkhard Ludewig; Gennady Bocharov
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  A new model for the estimation of cell proliferation dynamics using CFSE data.

Authors:  H T Banks; Karyn L Sutton; W Clayton Thompson; Gennady Bocharov; Marie Doumic; Tim Schenkel; Jordi Argilaguet; Sandra Giest; Cristina Peligero; Andreas Meyerhans
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  An Inverse Problem for a Class of Conditional Probability Measure-Dependent Evolution Equations.

Authors:  Inom Mirzaev; Erin C Byrne; David M Bortz
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.407

6.  Stretched cell cycle model for proliferating lymphocytes.

Authors:  Mark R Dowling; Andrey Kan; Susanne Heinzel; Jie H S Zhou; Julia M Marchingo; Cameron J Wellard; John F Markham; Philip D Hodgkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Estimation of cell proliferation dynamics using CFSE data.

Authors:  H T Banks; Karyn L Sutton; W Clayton Thompson; Gennady Bocharov; Dirk Roose; Tim Schenkel; Andreas Meyerhans
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 1.758

8.  Quantifying T lymphocyte turnover.

Authors:  Rob J De Boer; Alan S Perelson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 9.  Stochastic models of lymphocyte proliferation and death.

Authors:  Anton Zilman; Vitaly V Ganusov; Alan S Perelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Numerical modelling of label-structured cell population growth using CFSE distribution data.

Authors:  Tatyana Luzyanina; Dirk Roose; Tim Schenkel; Martina Sester; Stephan Ehl; Andreas Meyerhans; Gennady Bocharov
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.