Literature DB >> 17093990

Cognitive and biomechanical influences in pianists' finger tapping.

Janeen D Loehr1, Caroline Palmer.   

Abstract

Movement sequences such as typing or tapping display important interactions among finger movements arising from anticipatory motion (preparing for upcoming events) and coupling (non-independence among fingers). We examined pianists' finger tapping for the influence of cognitive chunking processes and biomechanical coupling constraints. In a synchronization-continuation task, pianists repeatedly tapped four-finger sequences that differed in terms of the chunks that formed subsequences and in the transitions among physically adjacent or non-adjacent fingers. Chunking influenced intertap intervals, regardless of the particular fingers tapped; the final tap of each chunk was lengthened and less variable relative to other taps. The particular fingers tapped influenced peak finger heights, consistency of motion, and velocity-acceleration patterns, regardless of chunking. Thus, cognitive constraints influenced timing, whereas biomechanical factors influenced motion trajectories. These findings provide an important caveat for study of anticipatory motion by documenting the influence of biomechanical coupling on motion trajectories.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17093990     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0760-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  The role of sub-maximal force production in the enslaving phenomenon.

Authors:  S Slobounov; J Johnston; H Chiang; W Ray
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-08       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements.

Authors:  Howard N Zelaznik; Rebecca M C Spencer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Sakai; Katsuya Kitaguchi; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Response programming, as assessed by reaction time, does not establish commands for particular muscles.

Authors:  S T Klapp
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Coordination of bowing and fingering in violin playing.

Authors:  Andreas P Baader; Oleg Kazennikov; Mario Wiesendanger
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-26

6.  A principle of error compensation studied within a task of force production by a redundant set of fingers.

Authors:  M L Latash; Z M Li; V M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Units of knowledge in music performance.

Authors:  C Palmer; C van de Sande
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The hand of the musician: the kinematics of the bidigital finger system with anatomical restrictions.

Authors:  J N Leijnse; C J Snijders; J E Bonte; J M Landsmeer; J J Kalker; J C Van der Meulen; G J Sonneveld; S E Hovius
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; S B Kenny; M A Derr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Baby hands that move to the rhythm of language: hearing babies acquiring sign languages babble silently on the hands.

Authors:  Laura Ann Petitto; Siobhan Holowka; Lauren E Sergio; Bronna Levy; David J Ostry
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-08
View more
  12 in total

1.  Tactile feedback and timing accuracy in piano performance.

Authors:  Werner Goebl; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A new way to quantify the fidelity of imitation: preliminary results with gesture sequences.

Authors:  Brian J Gold; Marc Pomplun; Nichola J Rice; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Tapping with intentional drift.

Authors:  A N Vardy; A Daffertshofer; P J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Temporal and kinematic consistency predict sequence awareness.

Authors:  Molly J Jaynes; Marc H Schieber; Jonathan W Mink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Reaching around obstacles accounts for uncertainty in coordinate transformations.

Authors:  Parisa Abedi Khoozani; Dimitris Voudouris; Gunnar Blohm; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Rate effects on timing, key velocity, and finger kinematics in piano performance.

Authors:  Simone Dalla Bella; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dissociable effects of practice variability on learning motor and timing skills.

Authors:  Baptiste Caramiaux; Frédéric Bevilacqua; Marcelo M Wanderley; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fingers Phrase Music Differently: Trial-to-Trial Variability in Piano Scale Playing and Auditory Perception Reveal Motor Chunking.

Authors:  Floris Tijmen van Vugt; Hans-Christian Jabusch; Eckart Altenmüller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-16

9.  Changes in motor function in the unaffected hand of stroke patients should not be ignored.

Authors:  Lingli Zhang; Peihong Li; Zhibang Mao; Xiang Qi; Jun Zou; Zhusheng Yu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Three-dimensional reach trajectories as a probe of real-time decision-making between multiple competing targets.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.