Literature DB >> 2045769

Peak shift revisited: a test of alternative interpretations.

D R Thomas1, K Mood, S Morrison, E Wiertelak.   

Abstract

In Experiment 1, 2 groups of human subjects were trained to respond to 1 of 2 light intensity stimuli, S2 or S4, and then were tested for generalization with a randomized series of increasing values from S1 to S11. Both groups, including the group trained to respond to dimmer value, showed peak shifts to a brighter more centrally located test stimulus. In Experiment 2, which used line angle stimuli, both the size of the difference between S+ and S- and the range of test stimuli that extended beyond S+ were varied. The larger the S(+)-S- separation and the larger the range, the greater was the peak shift obtained. In Experiment 3, training involved an S- (line angle) surrounded by 2 S+ values with testing symmetrical about the training values and covering either a narrow or a wide range. The wide range produced greater peak shifts in both directions from S-. All 3 experiments support an adaptation-level interpretation of intradimensional discrimination learning and generalization test performance in human subjects. Related work with animals suggests the presence of similar processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2045769     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.17.2.130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  13 in total

1.  Stimulus control and generalization of point-loss punishment with humans.

Authors:  J O'Donnell; J Crosbie; D C Williams; K J Saunders
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Relational learning in a context of transposition: a review.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Predicting shifts in generalization gradients with perceptrons.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Milen L Radell; Lauren M Guillette; Christopher B Sturdy; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Temporal dynamics of generalization and representational distortion.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

5.  A comparison of generalization functions and frame of reference effects in different training paradigms.

Authors:  D R Thomas; M Lusky; S Morrison
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-06

6.  Song discrimination learning in zebra finches induces highly divergent responses to novel songs.

Authors:  Machteld N Verzijden; Eric Etman; Caroline van Heijningen; Marianne van der Linden; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Determinants of range effects in face recognition.

Authors:  Eric L Verbeek; Marcia L Spetch; Ken Cheng; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 8.  Perceptual variability: Implications for learning and generalization.

Authors:  Jonas Zaman; Anastasia Chalkia; Ann-Kathrin Zenses; Antoine Selim Bilgin; Tom Beckers; Bram Vervliet; Yannick Boddez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02

9.  Perceptual errors are related to shifts in generalization of conditioned responding.

Authors:  Jonas Zaman; Dieter Struyf; Eva Ceulemans; Bram Vervliet; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-24

10.  Learning-related shifts in generalization gradients for complex sounds.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.