Literature DB >> 17086087

Comparing cochlear implant users' speech performance with processor fittings based on conventionally determined T and C levels or on compound action potential thresholds and live-voice speech in a prospective balanced crossover study.

Christina Willeboer1, Guido F Smoorenburg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to improve the efficiency of the fitting procedure of cochlear implant processors by making use of measurements of the electrically evoked compound actio potential (ECAP) and live-voice speech.
DESIGN: In a randomised prospective cross-over design we compare speech performance of eighteen adult subjects when following the conventional fitting procedure to a procedure in which we use the profile of the ECAP threshold levels across the full electrode array measured intra-operatively. The overall level of the profile is shifted (by an equal amount of current units per electrode) until we find the threshold for live speech (new T levels) and the loudness comfort level (new C levels). Each fitting procedure is tested for 6 wk. Speech performance is measured in quiet and in noise every other week.
RESULTS: The results show little difference between the scores (Dutch CVC words) for the conventional fitting procedure and the ECAP based fitting, although the T and C levels may differ markedly.
CONCLUSION: The new fitting procedure is much faster and easier in the initial phase. Further improvement of performance may be obtained in a later stage of the fitting procedure by changing some individual electrodes on the basis of subjective responses.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17086087     DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000240811.67906.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; R Beck; L Jung; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Intraoperative audiological-technical diagnostics during cochlear implant surgery].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  TNRT profiles with the nucleus research platform 8 system.

Authors:  W K Lai; N Dillier; B P Weber; T Lenarz; R Battmer; B Gantz; C Brown; N Cohen; S Waltzman; M Skinner; L Holden; R Cowan; P Busby; M Killian
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Evaluating hearing performance with cochlear implants within the same patient using daily randomization and imaging-based fitting - The ELEPHANT study.

Authors:  L J G Lambriks; M van Hoof; J A Debruyne; M Janssen; J Chalupper; K A van der Heijden; J R Hof; C A Hellingman; E L J George; E M J Devocht
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  A psychoacoustic application for the adjustment of electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Johannes Plesch; Benjamin P Ernst; Sebastian Strieth; Tobias Rader
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The next generation of Nucleus(®) fitting: a multiplatform approach towards universal cochlear implant management.

Authors:  Andrew Botros; Rami Banna; Saji Maruthurkkara
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.117

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.