Literature DB >> 17084863

A mathematical model of the treatment and survival of patients with high-grade brain tumours.

Norman F Kirkby1, Sarah J Jefferies, Raj Jena, Neil G Burnet.   

Abstract

More years of life per patient are lost as the result of primary brain tumours than any other form of cancer. The most aggressive of these is known as glioblastoma (GBM). The median survival time of patients with GBM is under 10 months and the outlook has hardly improved over the past 20 years. Generally, these tumours are remarkably resistant to radiotherapy and yet about 2-3% of all GBMs appear to be cured. The objectives of this study were to formulate a mathematical and phenomenological model of tumour growth in a population of patients with GBM to predict survival, and to use the model to extract biological information from clinical data. The model describes the growth of the tumour and the resulting damage to the normal brain using simple concepts borrowed from chemical reaction engineering. Death is assumed to result when the amount of surviving normal brain falls to a critical level. Radiotherapy is assumed to destroy tumour but not healthy brain. Simple rules are included to represent approximately the clinician's decisions about what type of treatment to offer each patient. A population of patients is constructed by assuming that key parameters can be sampled from statistical distributions. Following Monte Carlo simulation, the model can be fitted to data from clinical trials. The model reproduces clinical data extremely accurately. This suggests that the long-term survivors are not a separate sub-population but are the 'lucky tail' of a unimodal distribution. The estimated values of radiation sensitivity (represented as SF2, the survival fraction after 2Gy) suggest the presence of severe hypoxia, which renders cells less sensitive to radiation. The model can predict the probable age distribution of tumours at presentation. The model shows the complicated effects of waiting times for treatment on the survival outcomes, and is used to predict the effects of escalation of radiotherapy dose. The model may aid the design of clinical trials using radiotherapy for patients with GBM, especially in helping to estimate the size of trial required. It is also designed in a generic form, and might be applicable to other tumour types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17084863     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  12 in total

1.  Modelling lymphoma therapy and outcome.

Authors:  Katja Roesch; Dirk Hasenclever; Markus Scholz
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 2.  Proton beam therapy: perspectives on the National Health Service England clinical service and research programme.

Authors:  Neil G Burnet; Ranald I Mackay; Ed Smith; Amy L Chadwick; Gillian A Whitfield; David J Thomson; Matthew Lowe; Norman F Kirkby; Adrian M Crellin; Karen J Kirkby
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of a glioma immune interaction model.

Authors:  Subhas Khajanchi; Juan J Nieto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  In silico cancer modeling: is it ready for prime time?

Authors:  Thomas S Deisboeck; Le Zhang; Jeongah Yoon; Jose Costa
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-10-14

5.  (18)F-Fluorothymidine PET-CT for resected malignant gliomas before radiotherapy: tumor extent according to proliferative activity compared with MRI.

Authors:  Fen Zhao; Minghuan Li; Zhiheng Wang; Zheng Fu; Yunfeng Cui; Zhaoqiu Chen; Jinming Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A mathematical model to elucidate brain tumor abrogation by immunotherapy with T11 target structure.

Authors:  Sandip Banerjee; Subhas Khajanchi; Swapna Chaudhuri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Relationship between Glioblastoma Dose Volume Parameters Measured by Dual Time Point Fluoroethylthyrosine-PET and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Maciej Harat; Bogdan Małkowski; Izabela Wiatrowska; Roman Makarewicz; Krzysztof Roszkowski
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  'It was nothing that you would think was anything': Qualitative analysis of appraisal and help seeking preceding brain cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Suzanne E Scott; Clarissa Penfold; Smiji Saji; Sarah Curtis; Colin Watts; Willie Hamilton; Alexis J Joannides; Fiona M Walter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  [(18)F]Fluoroethyltyrosine- positron emission tomography-guided radiotherapy for high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Damien C Weber; Thomas Zilli; Franz Buchegger; Nathalie Casanova; Guy Haller; Michel Rouzaud; Philippe Nouet; Giovanna Dipasquale; Osman Ratib; Habib Zaidi; Hansjorg Vees; Raymond Miralbell
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Computer implementation of a new therapeutic model for GBM tumor.

Authors:  Ali Jamali Nazari; Dariush Sardari; Ahmad Reza Vali; Keivan Maghooli
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.