Literature DB >> 24338592

Modelling lymphoma therapy and outcome.

Katja Roesch1, Dirk Hasenclever, Markus Scholz.   

Abstract

Dose and time intensifications of chemotherapy improved the outcome of lymphoma therapy. However, recent study results show that too intense therapies can result in inferior tumour control. We hypothesise that the immune system plays a key role in controlling residual tumour cells after treatment. More intense therapies result in a stronger depletion of immune cells allowing an early re-growth of the tumour.We propose a differential equations model of the dynamics and interactions of tumour and immune cells under chemotherapy. Major model features are an exponential tumour growth, a modulation of the production of effector cells by the presence of the tumour (immunogenicity), and mutual destruction of tumour and immune cells. Chemotherapy causes damage to both, immune and tumour cells. Growth rate, chemosensitivity, immunogenicity, and initial size of the tumour are assumed to be patient-specific, resulting in heterogeneity regarding therapy outcome. Maximum-entropy distributions of these parameters were estimated on the basis of clinical survival data. The resulting model can explain the outcome of five different chemotherapeutic regimens and corresponding hazard-ratios.We conclude that our model explains observed paradox effects in lymphoma therapy by the simple assumption of a relevant anti-tumour effect of the immune system. Heterogeneity of therapy outcomes can be explained by distributions of model parameters, which can be estimated on the basis of clinical survival data. We demonstrate how the model can be used to make predictions regarding yet untested therapy options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24338592      PMCID: PMC3925304          DOI: 10.1007/s11538-013-9925-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  41 in total

Review 1.  Modelling of chemotherapy: the effective dose approach.

Authors:  D Hasenclever; O Brosteanu; T Gerike; M Loeffler
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.673

2.  Quantification of repertoire diversity of influenza-specific epitopes with predominant public or private TCR usage.

Authors:  Katherine Kedzierska; E Bridie Day; Jing Pi; Stephen B Heard; Peter C Doherty; Stephen J Turner; Stanley Perlman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  R I Fisher; E R Gaynor; S Dahlberg; M M Oken; T M Grogan; E M Mize; J H Glick; C A Coltman; T P Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Advanced diffuse histiocytic lymphoma, a potentially curable disease.

Authors:  V T DeVita; G P Canellos; B Chabner; P Schein; S P Hubbard; R C Young
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Sudden appearance and spontaneous regression of diffuse large B cell lymphoma in a man with a broken arm.

Authors:  Peter A Engel; Ching Lee
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-03-05

Review 6.  Mathematical models of cancer dormancy.

Authors:  Karen Page; Jonathan W Uhr
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2005-03

7.  Nonlinear dynamics of immunogenic tumors: parameter estimation and global bifurcation analysis.

Authors:  V A Kuznetsov; I A Makalkin; M A Taylor; A S Perelson
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.758

8.  Clinical evidence of a graft-versus-lymphoma effect against relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  M R Bishop; R M Dean; S M Steinberg; J Odom; S Z Pavletic; C Chow; S Pittaluga; C Sportes; N M Hardy; J Gea-Banacloche; A Kolstad; R E Gress; D H Fowler
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL.

Authors:  Michael Pfreundschuh; Lorenz Trümper; Marita Kloess; Rudolf Schmits; Alfred C Feller; Christian Rübe; Christian Rudolph; Marcel Reiser; Dieter K Hossfeld; Hartmut Eimermacher; Dirk Hasenclever; Norbert Schmitz; Markus Loeffler
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Interactions between macrophages and T-lymphocytes: tumor sneaking through intrinsic to helper T cell dynamics.

Authors:  R J de Boer; P Hogeweg
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1986-06-07       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  5 in total

1.  Modeling cancer-immune responses to therapy.

Authors:  L G dePillis; A Eladdadi; A E Radunskaya
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Predictive Modeling of Drug Response in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Authors:  Hermann B Frieboes; Bryan R Smith; Zhihui Wang; Masakatsu Kotsuma; Ken Ito; Armin Day; Benjamin Cahill; Colin Flinders; Shannon M Mumenthaler; Parag Mallick; Eman Simbawa; A S Al-Fhaid; S R Mahmoud; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The roles of T cell competition and stochastic extinction events in chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Authors:  Gregory J Kimmel; Frederick L Locke; Philipp M Altrock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Model-based optimization of G-CSF treatment during cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sibylle Schirm; Christoph Engel; Sibylle Loibl; Markus Loeffler; Markus Scholz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  A review of nutrition and dietary interventions in oncology.

Authors:  Ashley Gray; Brian N Dang; Theodore B Moore; Roger Clemens; Peter Pressman
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-06-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.