Literature DB >> 17080267

Analysis of respiratory complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: preliminary observation of persistent aspiration risk.

B Zane Atkins1, Daniel L Fortes, Kevin T Watkins.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive (MI) esophageal resection (ER) has the theoretical advantage of reduced postoperative complications compared with standard ER. However, the impact of MIER on rates and severity of pulmonary complications is unclear. Four patients underwent laparoscopic gastroesophageal mobilization and resection followed by gastric pull-up and cervical esophageal anastomosis (MIER). Videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) assessed pharyngolaryngeal function postoperatively. All postoperative complications were documented. Each MIER was completed successfully without intraoperative complications. Mean operative time was 4.3 +/- 2 h. Postoperatively, VFSS detected laryngeal penetration, vocal cord paralysis, and/or aspiration in three patients, two of whom experienced severe respiratory complications. MIER patients are susceptible to aspiration, likely due to transient denervation of the pharynx and laryngeal structures. Following MIER, aggressive pulmonary toilet and aspiration precautions are emphasized to reduce pulmonary complications. Furthermore, serial evaluation of deglutition is encouraged to guide the safe and appropriate resumption of oral feeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17080267     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-006-9042-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  25 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort.

Authors:  Stephen H Bailey; David A Bull; David H Harpole; Jeffrey J Rentz; Leigh A Neumayer; Theodore N Pappas; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson; Barbara Krasnicka; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Laparoscopically assisted transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus.

Authors:  W T Van den Broek; O Makay; F J Berends; J Z Yuan; A P J Houdijk; S Meijer; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; D M Follette; B M Wolfe; P D Schneider; P Roberts; J E Goodnight
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

5.  Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Sina Ercan; Thomas W Rice; Sudish C Murthy; Lisa A Rybicki; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  The association between laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits, pharyngeal motor function, and the prevalence of aspiration with thin liquids.

Authors:  Michael Setzen; Manderly A Cohen; Philip W Perlman; Peter C Belafsky; Joel Guss; Kenneth F Mattucci; Michael Ditkoff
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 7.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  A laparoscopy-assisted surgical approach to esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Luigi Bonavina; Davide Bona; Pierre René Binyom; Alberto Peracchia
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Respiratory complications after surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. A study of 309 patients according to the type of resection.

Authors:  P Dumont; J M Wihlm; J G Hentz; N Roeslin; R Lion; G Morand
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure following oesophagectomy: Is it safe? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael Charlesworth; Tom Lawton; Stephen Fletcher
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-02-12

2.  Prospective Comprehensive Swallowing Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomies with Cervical Anastomosis: Silent Versus Vocal Aspiration.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; Amy Fullerton; Georgios Rossidis; Michael Michel; Ryan Thomas; George Sarosi; Jeff White; Christopher Giordano; Steven Hochwald
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Post-discharge complications after esophagectomy account for high readmission rates.

Authors:  Sophia Y Chen; Daniela Molena; Miloslawa Stem; Benedetto Mungo; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Alteration of the oral environment in patients undergoing esophagectomy during the perioperative period.

Authors:  Masami Yoshioka; Daisuke Hinode; Yota Yamamoto; Yoshihito Furukita; Akira Tangoku
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.