Literature DB >> 17079876

The medical genetics workforce: an analysis of clinical geneticist subgroups.

Judith A Cooksey1, Gaetano Forte, Patricia A Flanagan, Judith Benkendorf, Miriam G Blitzer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical geneticists with a Doctor of Medicine degree face challenges to meet the growing population demand for genetic services. This study was designed to assist the profession with workforce planning by identifying clinically relevant subgroups of geneticists and describing their professional characteristics and clinical practices. Geneticists' patient care productivity is compared across subgroups and other medical specialists.
METHODS: Part of a comprehensive national study of genetic services and the health workforce, this study uses data from a 2003 survey of geneticists certified by the American Board of Medical Genetics. This study includes 610 clinical geneticists who spend at least 5% of their time in direct patient-care services. An iterative approach was used to identify five subgroups based on the types of new patients seen. We conducted a descriptive analysis of subgroups by demographic, training, professional, and practice characteristics.
RESULTS: The subgroups include general (36%), pediatric (28%), reproductive (15%), metabolic (14%), and adult (7%) geneticists. Clinically relevant variations across subgroups were noted in training, professional, and practice parameters. Subgroups vary across patient care hours (median, 15-33 hours/week) and total weekly work hours (52-60 hours). New patient visits (mean, 222-900/year) are higher than follow-up patient visits (mean, 155-405) for all subgroups except metabolic geneticists.
CONCLUSION: Although many geneticists practice as generalist geneticists, this study provides an evidence base for distinguishing clinically relevant subgroups of geneticists. Geneticists provide similar numbers of new patient visits and far fewer follow-up visits than other medical specialists. These findings are relevant to geneticist workforce planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17079876     DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000242307.83900.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  15 in total

1.  To ban or not to ban? Clinical geneticists' views on the regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Heidi Carmen Howard; Pascal Borry
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Diversity in genetic counseling: past, present and future.

Authors:  Ilana Suez Mittman; Katy Downs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Assessment of clinical practices among cancer genetic counselors.

Authors:  Deborah Wham; Thuy Vu; Gayun Chan-Smutko; Christine Kobelka; Diana Urbauer; Brandie Heald
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  What do clinicians derive from partnering with their patients? A reliable and valid measure of "personal meaning in patient care".

Authors:  Gail Geller; Barbara A Bernhardt; Joseph Carrese; Cynda H Rushton; Ken Kolodner
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-05-15

Review 5.  Genetic Testing: Consent and Result Disclosure for Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  W Andrew Faucett; Holly Peay; Curtis R Coughlin
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.456

6.  Expansion of genetic services utilizing a general genetic counseling clinic.

Authors:  V L Hannig; M P Cohen; J P Pfotenhauer; M D Williams; T M Morgan; J A Phillips
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Expanding the genetic counseling workforce: program directors' views on increasing the size of genetic counseling graduate programs.

Authors:  Vivian Pan; Beverly M Yashar; Rachel Pothast; Catherine Wicklund
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  The time-consuming demands of the practice of medical genetics in the era of advanced genomic testing.

Authors:  Rivka Sukenik-Halevy; Mark David Ludman; Shay Ben-Shachar; Annick Raas-Rothschild
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  2016 ACMG Annual Meeting presidential address: the practice of medical genetics: myths and realities.

Authors:  Gerald L Feldman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Distress and burnout among genetic service providers.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Cynda H Rushton; Joseph Carrese; Reed E Pyeritz; Ken Kolodner; Gail Geller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.