OBJECTIVE: Burnout is high among clinicians and may relate to loss of "meaning" in patient care. We sought to develop and validate a measure of "personal meaning" that practitioners derive from patient care. METHODS: As part of a larger study of well-being among genetics professionals, we conducted three focus groups of clinical genetics professionals: physicians, nurses and genetic counselors (N=29). Participants were asked: "What gives you meaning in patient care?" Eight themes were identified, converted into Likert items, and included in a questionnaire. Next, we mailed the questionnaire to clinical geneticists, genetic counselors and genetic nurses (N=480) randomly selected from mailing lists of their professional associations. Results were subjected to exploratory factor analysis. The survey also included validated scales of burnout and professional satisfaction, and a 1-item measure of gratitude, to assess predictive validity. RESULTS: 214 eligible providers completed the survey out of an estimated 348 eligible (61% response rate). Factor analysis resulted in a unidimensional scale consisting of 6-items with an alpha of 0.82 and an eigen value of 3.2. Factor loadings ranged from 0.69-0.77. The mean total score was 18.1 (S.D. 3.7) out of a possible high score of 24. Higher meaning scores were associated with being female (p=0.044), a nurse (p<0.001), and in practice longer (p=0.006). Meaning scores were inversely correlated with burnout (p<0.001), and positively correlated with gratitude (p<0.001) and professional satisfaction (p<0.022). CONCLUSION: The 6-item "personal meaning in patient care" scale demonstrates high reliability and predictive validity in a select group of health professionals. Future research should validate this scale in a broader population of clinicians. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The scale could be useful in identifying providers at risk of burnout, and in evaluating interventions designed to counteract burnout, enhance meaning and improve communication and partnership between providers and patients.
OBJECTIVE: Burnout is high among clinicians and may relate to loss of "meaning" in patient care. We sought to develop and validate a measure of "personal meaning" that practitioners derive from patient care. METHODS: As part of a larger study of well-being among genetics professionals, we conducted three focus groups of clinical genetics professionals: physicians, nurses and genetic counselors (N=29). Participants were asked: "What gives you meaning in patient care?" Eight themes were identified, converted into Likert items, and included in a questionnaire. Next, we mailed the questionnaire to clinical geneticists, genetic counselors and genetic nurses (N=480) randomly selected from mailing lists of their professional associations. Results were subjected to exploratory factor analysis. The survey also included validated scales of burnout and professional satisfaction, and a 1-item measure of gratitude, to assess predictive validity. RESULTS: 214 eligible providers completed the survey out of an estimated 348 eligible (61% response rate). Factor analysis resulted in a unidimensional scale consisting of 6-items with an alpha of 0.82 and an eigen value of 3.2. Factor loadings ranged from 0.69-0.77. The mean total score was 18.1 (S.D. 3.7) out of a possible high score of 24. Higher meaning scores were associated with being female (p=0.044), a nurse (p<0.001), and in practice longer (p=0.006). Meaning scores were inversely correlated with burnout (p<0.001), and positively correlated with gratitude (p<0.001) and professional satisfaction (p<0.022). CONCLUSION: The 6-item "personal meaning in patient care" scale demonstrates high reliability and predictive validity in a select group of health professionals. Future research should validate this scale in a broader population of clinicians. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The scale could be useful in identifying providers at risk of burnout, and in evaluating interventions designed to counteract burnout, enhance meaning and improve communication and partnership between providers and patients.
Authors: E S Williams; T R Konrad; M Linzer; J McMurray; D E Pathman; M Gerrity; M D Schwartz; W E Scheckler; J Van Kirk; E Rhodes; J Douglas Journal: Med Care Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Mohammadreza Hojat; Joseph S Gonnella; Thomas J Nasca; Salvatore Mangione; Michael Vergare; Michael Magee Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Anthony C Waddimba; Melissa Scribani; Melinda A Hasbrouck; Nicole Krupa; Paul Jenkins; John J May Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Anthony C Waddimba; Melissa Scribani; Nicole Krupa; John J May; Paul Jenkins Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-10-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Barbara A Bernhardt; Cynda H Rushton; Joseph Carrese; Reed E Pyeritz; Ken Kolodner; Gail Geller Journal: Genet Med Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 8.822