Literature DB >> 17076977

Assessing glucose meter accuracy.

Darius Arabadjief1, James H Nichols.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring of blood glucose plays an important role in the management of diabetes, particularly in patients treated with insulin. Blood glucose meters must have sufficient accuracy to allow patients and clinicians to monitor glycemic control and then modify treatment accordingly. Although several standards have been proposed, a consensus about how to measure glucose meter accuracy is not available. SCOPE: An informal review of recently published articles dealing with glucose meter accuracy was conducted to provide recommendations for evaluating accuracy relevant to the practicing clinician.
FINDINGS: Whether in clinical practice or in accuracy studies, the accuracy of blood glucose meters is typically determined by comparing meter results to those obtained by a clinical laboratory method on samples collected from the same patient at the same time. However, multiple sample-related, analysis-related, and data display-related factors can have an impact on accuracy determination. Clinicians need to recognize these factors and take steps to minimize their impact when assessing the accuracy of glucose meters used by their patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Although modern glucose meters show variable results with respect to analytical measures of accuracy, error grid analysis demonstrates that measurements deemed clinically acceptable approach 100%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17076977     DOI: 10.1185/030079906X148274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  8 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of point-of-care glucose measurements.

Authors:  Annette Rebel; Mark A Rice; Brenda G Fahy
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

2.  Fundamental Importance of Reference Glucose Analyzer Accuracy for Evaluating the Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (BGMSs).

Authors:  Timothy S Bailey; Leslie J Klaff; Jane F Wallace; Carmine Greene; Scott Pardo; Bern Harrison; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

3.  Performance analysis of the OneTouch UltraVue blood glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  Anna Chang; Alice Orth; Bryan Le; Perla Menchavez; Lupe Miller
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 4.  Glucose meters: a review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results.

Authors:  Ksenia Tonyushkina; James H Nichols
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

5.  Accuracy of Human and Veterinary Point-of-Care Glucometers for Use in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta), Sooty Mangabeys (Cercocebus atys), and Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Elizabeth A Clemmons; Melissa I Stovall; Devon C Owens; Jessica A Scott; Amelia C Jones-Wilkes; Doty J Kempf; Kelly F Ethun
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 6.  Analytical and clinical performance of blood glucose monitors.

Authors:  Suzanne Austin Boren; William L Clarke
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

7.  Performance of point-of-care diagnostics for glucose, lactate, and hemoglobin in the management of severe malaria in a resource-constrained hospital in Uganda.

Authors:  Michael Hawkes; Andrea L Conroy; Robert O Opoka; Sophie Namasopo; W Conrad Liles; Chandy C John; Kevin C Kain
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Spurious elevation of glucose concentration during administration of high dose of ascorbic acid in a patient with type 2 diabetes on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Soo Kyoung Kim; Jong Ryeal Hahm; Ho-Su Kim; Sungsu Kim; Tae Sik Jung; Jung Hwa Jung; Hye Ryun Lee; Deok Ryong Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.759

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.