Literature DB >> 17076810

Attentional capacity for processing concurrent stimuli is larger across sensory modalities than within a modality.

Durk Talsma1, Tracy J Doty, Roy Strowd, Marty G Woldorff.   

Abstract

One finding in attention research is that visual and auditory attention mechanisms are linked together. Such a link would predict a central, amodal capacity limit in processing visual and auditory stimuli. Here we show that this is not the case. Letter streams were accompanied by asynchronously presented streams of auditory, visual, and audiovisual objects. Either the letter streams or the visual, auditory, or audiovisual parts of the object streams were attended. Attending to various aspects of the objects resulted in modulations of the letter-stream-elicited steady-state evoked potentials (SSVEPs). SSVEPs were larger when auditory objects were attended than when either visual objects alone or when auditory and visual object stimuli were attended together. SSVEP amplitudes were the same in the latter conditions, indicating that attentional capacity between modalities is larger than attentional capacity within one and the same modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17076810     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00452.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  28 in total

1.  Sustained selective intermodal attention modulates processing of language-like stimuli.

Authors:  Christian Keitel; Erich Schröger; Katja Saupe; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Staying responsive to the world: modality-specific and -nonspecific contributions to speeded auditory, tactile, and visual stimulus detection.

Authors:  Robert Langner; Thilo Kellermann; Simon B Eickhoff; Frank Boers; Anjan Chatterjee; Klaus Willmes; Walter Sturm
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Exploring the temporal dynamics of sustained and transient spatial attention using steady-state visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Bo Hong; Shangkai Gao; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration.

Authors:  Durk Talsma; Daniel Senkowski; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The elicitation of audiovisual steady-state responses: multi-sensory signal congruity and phase effects.

Authors:  Julian Jenkins; Ariane E Rhone; William J Idsardi; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  A cognitive training intervention improves modality-specific attention in a randomized controlled trial of healthy older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mozolic; Ashley B Long; Ashley R Morgan; Melissa Rawley-Payne; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 7.  The neural basis of multisensory integration in the midbrain: its organization and maturation.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Understanding individual face discrimination by means of fast periodic visual stimulation.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neural mechanisms of intermodal sustained selective attention with concurrently presented auditory and visual stimuli.

Authors:  Katja Saupe; Erich Schröger; Søren K Andersen; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Postnatal experiences influence how the brain integrates information from different senses.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Thomas J Perrault; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.