Literature DB >> 17075235

Rigid and flexible control of eating behavior and their relationship to dieting status.

C A Timko1, J Perone.   

Abstract

This study examined whether or not rigid and flexible dimensions of restraint could differentiate between women who self-identified as dieting to lose weight versus those who self-identified as dieting to maintain weight. Four hundred thirty-three women responded to dichotomous questions regarding their dieting status and completed the Eating Inventory and Rigid and Flexible Control Scales (RC16 and FC12, respectively). Logistic regressions were conducted using dieting status as the dependent variable and RC16 scores, FC12 scores, susceptibility to overeating, and BMI as the independent variables. Scores on the RC16 and BMI correctly identified 73.6% of women as dieting to lose weight; scores on the RC16 and FC12 correctly identified 52.6% of women as dieting to maintain weight. Susceptibility to overeating was unrelated to dieting status. Results indicate that rigid control over eating is strongly related to dieting to lose weight and that both rigid and flexible control are related to dieting to maintain weight. This latter relationship is in need of further exploration. Results of this study support the contention that restraint and dieting are related, however, they are not equivalent constructs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17075235     DOI: 10.1007/bf03327564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Weight Disord        ISSN: 1124-4909            Impact factor:   4.652


  14 in total

1.  Appearance versus health: does the reason for dieting affect dieting behavior?

Authors:  Erin Putterman; Wolfgang Linden
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-04

2.  Are dietary restraint scales valid measures of acute dietary restriction? Unobtrusive observational data suggest not.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Melissa Fisher; Michael R Lowe
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2004-03

3.  Dietary restraint and disinhibition: is restraint a homogeneous construct?

Authors:  J Westenhoefer
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 4.  The (mis)measurement of restraint: an analysis of conceptual and psychometric issues.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; C P Herman; J Polivy; G A King; S T McGree
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1988-02

5.  The measurement of restraint: confounding success and failure?

Authors:  J Ogden
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.861

6.  Cognitive control of eating behaviour and the disinhibition effect.

Authors:  J Westenhoefer; P Broeckmann; A K Münch; V Pudel
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 7.  The effects of dieting on eating behavior: a three-factor model.

Authors:  M R Lowe
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Putting restrained and unrestrained nondieters on short-term diets: effects on eating.

Authors:  M R Lowe
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Food intake and physical activity: a comparison of three measures of dieting.

Authors:  S A French; R W Jeffery; R R Wing
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.

Authors:  A J Stunkard; S Messick
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.006

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Factors Influencing Athletes' Food Choices.

Authors:  Karen L Birkenhead; Gary Slater
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Change in eating and body related behaviors during the first year of university.

Authors:  C A Timko; K Mooney; A Juarascio
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2010 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 4.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.