Literature DB >> 7826055

Cognitive control of eating behaviour and the disinhibition effect.

J Westenhoefer1, P Broeckmann, A K Münch, V Pudel.   

Abstract

Restrained eaters have been reported to overeat following a high caloric preload, a phenomenon referred to as the disinhibition effect. However this effect has not been found when subjects were classified by the restraint subscales of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ; Stunkard & Messick, 1985) or the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (van Strien et al., 1986). The present study investigates the disinhibition effect in 133 normal-weight young women, using a two-factorial classification including the TFEQ-restraint and the TFEQ-disinhibition scale. The subjects were requested to consume ice-cream ad libitum during a taste test following a 200-ml milkshake preload or without preload. The results show that the behavioural disinhibition effect occurs only in subjects with simultaneous high scores on both subscales. In addition, subjects with high disinhibition scores consumed more ice-cream than low disinhibition subjects irrespective of their degree of restraint. While subjects with a more rigid control of eating behaviour did not show a difference in the amount of ice-cream consumed with or without preload, subjects with a more flexible control of eating behaviour reduced their intake following the preload condition. With regard to the Revised Restraint Scale (RRS Herman & Polivy, 1980) multiple regression results show that high RRS scores may be due to either higher TFEQ-restraint or higher TFEQ-disinhibition scores. The interpretation of the results favours the renaming of the TFEQ-disinhibition scale to "susceptibility to eating problems" because high scores on this scale indicate overeating in a variety of situations without requiring prior inhibition i.e. dietary restraint. It is supposed that high susceptibility to eating problems may be caused by rigid control of eating behaviour, whereas flexible control of eating behaviour may be a less problematic strategy of long-term weight control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7826055     DOI: 10.1006/appe.1994.1032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  37 in total

1.  What is eating you? Stress and the drive to eat.

Authors:  Lisa M Groesz; Shannon McCoy; Jenna Carl; Laura Saslow; Judith Stewart; Nancy Adler; Barbara Laraia; Elissa Epel
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Interaction between disinhibition and restraint: Implications for body weight and eating disturbance.

Authors:  E J Bryant; K Kiezebrink; N A King; J E Blundell
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2010 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Rigid and flexible control of eating behavior and their relationship to dieting status.

Authors:  C A Timko; J Perone
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.652

4.  Cue reactivity in male restrained eaters: the role of negative cognitions as predictors of food intake.

Authors:  A Hilbert; C Vögele; U Himmelmann
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Neither restrained eating nor tendency toward overeating predict food consumption after tension induction.

Authors:  M A Ouwens; T van Strien; C P van der Staak
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.652

6.  Aspects of eating behaviors "disinhibition" and "restraint" are related to weight gain and BMI in women.

Authors:  Nicholas P Hays; Susan B Roberts
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Characteristics of individuals who report present and past weight loss behaviours: results from a Canadian university community.

Authors:  Annette R Gallant; Émilie Pérusse-Lachance; Véronique Provencher; Catherine Bégin; Vicky Drapeau
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  Resting state differences between successful and unsuccessful restrained eaters.

Authors:  Yixiao Zhang; Shaorui Wang; Luqing Wei; Todd Jackson; Xiao Gao; Mingyue Xiao; Gaolang Gong; Hong Chen
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.978

9.  A novel classification paradigm for understanding the positive and negative outcomes associated with dieting.

Authors:  Ann F Haynos; Alison E Field; Denise E Wilfley; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.861

10.  Questionnaire and laboratory measures of eating behavior. Associations with energy intake and BMI in a community sample of working adults.

Authors:  Simone A French; Nathan R Mitchell; Julian Wolfson; Graham Finlayson; John E Blundell; Robert W Jeffery
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.