Literature DB >> 8477279

The measurement of restraint: confounding success and failure?

J Ogden1.   

Abstract

The present study examined the concept of restrained eating as measured by the Restraint Scale and the restrained eating section of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire. The results showed that when answering questionnaires, subjects do not differentiate between items relating to attempts at dieting and actual restrictive behavior and that restrained eating can be conceptualized in terms of both successful and failed restraint. In addition, the results suggest that subjects who report high scores on both these measures of restraint represent a population of dieters prone to overeating behavior. The results are discussed in terms of the population selected by measures of restrained eating and in relation to the definition of restraint.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8477279     DOI: 10.1002/1098-108x(199301)13:1<69::aid-eat2260130109>3.0.co;2-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Eat Disord        ISSN: 0276-3478            Impact factor:   4.861


  4 in total

1.  Appearance versus health: does the reason for dieting affect dieting behavior?

Authors:  Erin Putterman; Wolfgang Linden
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-04

2.  Smoking and weight control behaviors.

Authors:  M Facchini; R Rozensztejn; C González
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Rigid and flexible control of eating behavior and their relationship to dieting status.

Authors:  C A Timko; J Perone
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.652

4.  Assessment of dietary restraint: psychometric properties of the revised restraint scale in Hong Kong adolescents.

Authors:  Kwok-Kei Mak; Ching-Man Lai
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2012-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.