Literature DB >> 17072690

Site of fresh gas inlet and ratios of the delivered fraction and inspired fraction of inhaled isoflurane and sevoflurane in low-flow anesthesia.

Taeko Fukuda1, Atsuo Fukunaga, Hidenori Toyooka.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of low-flow anesthesia causes a discrepancy between the delivered fraction (FD) and the inspired fraction (FI) of inhaled gases. We compared the FI/FD ratios of a new circle (fresh gas inlet located between the inspiratory valve and the patient) to those of the conventional circle (fresh gas inlet located between the inspiratory valve and the CO2 absorber) in low-flow isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia, using three anesthetic machines (Dräger NM-GS, Dräger Fabius-GS, and ACOMA KMA-1300-III).
METHODS: Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to three experimental groups. For experiment 1, 32 patients were allocated to the NM-GS conventional/new, NM-GS new/conventional, ACOMA conventional/new, and ACOMA new/conventional groups. For experiment 2, 14 patients were allocated to ACOMA conventional/conventional and ACOMA new/new groups to measure isoflurane FI/FD ratios. For experiment 3, 36 patients were allocated to ACOMA conventional/conventional, ACOMA new/new, Fabius conventional/conventional, and Fabius new/new to measure sevoflurane FI/FD ratios.
RESULTS: In experiment 1, the NM-GS showed no significant changes in the FI/FD ratios. However, in the ACOMA, the new circle improved the FI/FD ratio. In experiment 2, the isoflurane FI/FD ratios in the new circle of the ACOMA were significantly higher than those in the conventional circle. In experiment 3, the sevoflurane FI/FD ratios in the new circle of both the ACOMA and the Fabius were significantly higher than those in the conventional circles.
CONCLUSION: The positioning of the fresh gas inlet between the inspiratory valve and the patient improved the FI/FD ratios of both isoflurane and sevoflurane during low-flow anesthesia in two decoupling-style anesthetic machines (ACOMA and Fabius).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17072690     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-006-0417-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  9 in total

1.  Clinical use of a small soda lime canister in a low-flow to-and-fro system.

Authors:  G G Lockwood; M Y Kadim; M K Chakrabarti; J G Whitwam
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  The effect of fresh gas flow and anesthetic technique on the ability to control acute hemodynamic responses during surgery.

Authors:  M N Avramov; J D Griffin; P F White
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Low and minimal flow inhalational anaesthesia.

Authors:  A D Baxter
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  The estimation of inspired desflurane concentration in a low-flow system.

Authors:  S Gowrie-Mohan; V Muralitharan; G G Lockwood
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Fresh gas flow is not the only determinant of volatile agent consumption: a multi-centre study of low-flow anaesthesia.

Authors:  J F Coetzee; L J Stewart
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  The effects of inflow, overflow and valve placement on economy of the circle system.

Authors:  E I Eger; C T Ethans
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1968 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 7.  Low-flow anaesthesia.

Authors:  J A Baum; A R Aitkenhead
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Assessment of vaporizer performance in low-flow and closed-circuit anesthesia.

Authors:  C Y Lin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  The quotient end-tidal/inspired concentration of sevoflurane in a low-flow system.

Authors:  Anders Johansson; Dag Lundberg; Hans Henrik Luttropp
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.452

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  The effect of fresh gas flow rate and type of anesthesia machine on time to reach target sevoflurane concentration.

Authors:  Hye Won Shin; Hae Na Yu; Go Eun Bae; Hyub Huh; Ji Yong Park; Ji Young Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.217

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.